Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1991 Sep;64(3):588–592. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.355

Histological features, DNA content and prognosis of breast carcinoma found incidentally or in screening.

H Joensuu 1, S Toikkanen 1, P J Klemi 1
PMCID: PMC1977651  PMID: 1911203

Abstract

Histology features, the nuclear DNA content and prognosis of 42 female breast carcinomas found in a physical examination based screening, 54 breast cancers found incidentally by medical personnel, and 274 breast cancers first suspected by the patient were compared. There was no significant difference in the distribution by primary tumour size (P = 0.08) or histological type (P = 0.87) of breast cancer between the screen-detected and 139 self-suspected cancers of women with similar mean age and living at the same time in the same city, but the screen-detected carcinomas were better differentiated (P = 0.0002), and had less mitoses (P = 0.008), less tumour necrosis (P = 0.004) and DNA aneuploidy (P = 0.01), smaller S-phase fractions (P = 0.009), less axillary metastases (P = 0.04), and had better outcome (P = 0.005) than self-suspected carcinomas. These parameters did not differ significantly between the screen-detected and incidentally found cancers, but incidental cancers had more often axillary metastases (P = 0.02). The results indicate that screen-detected breast carcinomas have favourable biological features suggesting low degree of malignant potential.

Full text

PDF
589

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adami H. O., Malker B., Holmberg L., Persson I., Stone B. The relation between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1986 Aug 28;315(9):559–563. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198608283150906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson I., Aspegren K., Janzon L., Landberg T., Lindholm K., Linell F., Ljungberg O., Ranstam J., Sigfússon B. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):943–948. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Camplejohn R. S., Macartney J. C., Morris R. W. Measurement of S-phase fractions in lymphoid tissue comparing fresh versus paraffin-embedded tissue and 4',6'-diamidino-2 phenylindole dihydrochloride versus propidium iodide staining. Cytometry. 1989 Jul;10(4):410–416. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990100408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hatschek T., Fagerberg G., Stål O., Sullivan S., Carstensen J., Gröntoft O., Nordenskjöld B. Cytometric characterization and clinical course of breast cancer diagnosed in a population-based screening program. Cancer. 1989 Sep 1;64(5):1074–1081. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890901)64:5<1074::aid-cncr2820640519>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hedley D. W., Friedlander M. L., Taylor I. W., Rugg C. A., Musgrove E. A. Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem. 1983 Nov;31(11):1333–1335. doi: 10.1177/31.11.6619538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kallioniemi O. P., Kärkkäinen A., Auvinen O., Mattila J., Koivula T., Hakama M. DNA flow cytometric analysis indicates that many breast cancers detected in the first round of mammographic screening have a low malignant potential. Int J Cancer. 1988 Nov 15;42(5):697–702. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910420511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nielsen M., Thomsen J. L., Primdahl S., Dyreborg U., Andersen J. A. Breast cancer and atypia among young and middle-aged women: a study of 110 medicolegal autopsies. Br J Cancer. 1987 Dec;56(6):814–819. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roberts M. M., Alexander F. E., Anderson T. J., Chetty U., Donnan P. T., Forrest P., Hepburn W., Huggins A., Kirkpatrick A. E., Lamb J. Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet. 1990 Feb 3;335(8684):241–246. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90066-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P., Venet L., Roeser R. Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1985 May;67:65–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tabár L., Fagerberg C. J., Gad A., Baldetorp L., Holmberg L. H., Gröntoft O., Ljungquist U., Lundström B., Månson J. C., Eklund G. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985 Apr 13;1(8433):829–832. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Verbeek A. L., Hendriks J. H., Holland R., Mravunac M., Sturmans F., Day N. E. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981. Lancet. 1984 Jun 2;1(8388):1222–1224. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91703-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES