. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Mar 28;31(3):231–253. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.03.011

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics for Non-Maltreated, Resilient, and Non-Resilient Children on Emotional Problems, Prosocial Behavior, and Reading Ability

		Maltreated
	Non- Maltreated	Resilient	Non-Resilient	Regression Model Fit	Resilient vs. Non-Maltreated	Resilient vs. Non-Resilient
	Means (SD)			F (df)	effect size	effect size
Emotional problems at 5	5.37 (5.31)	4.76 (4.39)	5.34 (5.49)	.56 (2, 1047)	.12	.11
Emotional problems at 7	5.14 (5.41)	4.27 (4.63)	6.79 (6.88)	5.24 (2, 1024)^**	.16	.40^**
Prosocial behavior at 5	11.85 (4.89)	12.93 (3.74)	10.25 (4.63)	9.80 (2, 1024)^***	.22	.61^***
Prosocial behavior at 7	12.80 (4.75)	13.80 (4.93)	11.40 (5.09)	5.74 (2, 1021)^***	.21	.48^**
	Percentages (n)			Wald χ² (df)	OR (95% C. I.) (effect size)	OR (95% C. I.) (effect size)
Average or above -average reading scores at 7	57.2 (964)	64.5 (44)	49.2 (85)	4.91 (2)	1.38 (.79; 2.35) (.17)	1.88 (1.02; 3.47)^* (.35)

^***

p ≤ .001,

^**

p ≤ .01,

p ≤ .05

Note: OR = odds ratio; ORs are transformed to compare (a) resilient versus non-maltreated and (b) resilient versus non-resilient children.