Skip to main content
. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1276–1281. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1276

Table 1.

Support values of selected branches

a b c d e f
NJ
   1 100 68.2 64.8 100 100 64.4
   2 100 91.6 (85.4) 100 100 47.3
  12 100 95.2 94.1 100 100 52.2
 123 100 79.2 94.2 100 100 81.2
 aa 100 100 74 100 100 94
MP
   1 100 39.3 80.0 100 100
   2 100 69.1 (77.5) 100 99.3
  12 100 46.6 97.3 100 100 48.5
 123 100 31.0 93.7 100 100
 aa 100 77.5 80.5 100 100 56.2
ML/QP
   1 96.0 94.3 (69.4) 100 95.1 74.7
   2 98.7 96.9 (83.6) 99.0 99.1
  12 98.4 94.8 (76.1) 100 98.3 70.3
 123 97.6 95.8 (77.9) 100 99.0 67.7
 aa 99.9 99.9 (64.6) 100 91.2 89.1

The numbers show bootstrap and support values in percent for selected branches (a–f) shown in Fig. 3. The analyses of the assembly of 25 taxa were carried out by NJ, MP, and ML/QP (maximum likelihood using the quartet puzzling) tree search algorithm for 1st (1) 2nd (2), 1st plus 2nd (12), 1st plus 2nd plus 3rd codon positions (123), as well as amino acid (aa), sequences. For 1st codon position all changes except transitions in leucine codons were used; for 2nd codon position all changes were included, and for 3rd codon position transversions were used (61). At the nucleotide level the NJ analysis was performed applying the HKY model of sequence evolution (62), whereas for amino acid sequences the Dayhoff matrix was used. For ML/QP, the TN model (63) for nucleotide sequences or the mtREV-22 model (42) for amino acid sequences were applied. Due to computational constraints bootstrap replications were limited to 100 in the case of NJ and MP analyses of amino acids, in other instances 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed. Dash (—) denotes unresolved relationship, and values in parentheses show the support for the separation between myomorph rodents and eutherians when the position of the guinea pig and the rabbit deviated from that shown in Fig. 3