TABLE 4.
−ln | LM0 | −ln | LM1 | −ln | LM2 | ωM2 | pM2 | nM2 | −ln | LM3 | ωM3 | pM3 | nM3 | −ln | LM7 | −ln | LM8 | ωM8 | pM8 | nM8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clade A | 60 | 10.4 | 59 | 53.3 | 59 | 11.0 | 5.56 | 0.053 | 8 | 59 | 13.6 | 4.46 | 0.082 | 16 | 59 | 59.2 | 59 | 11.2 | 5.08 | 0.064 | 9 |
Clade B | 25 | 9.2 | 25 | 9.7 | 25 | 9.7 | — | — | — | 25 | 8.7 | — | — | — | 25 | 9.7 | 25 | 9.7 | — | — | — |
The comparisons between models M0 and M3, M1 and M2, and M7 and M8 were only significant (p < 0.001) for clade A. ω and p estimates under purifying selection (ω < 1) or neutral selection (ω = 0) are not reported for any model.