Abstract
Osmotic movement of water across bacterial cell membranes is postulated to be a homeostatic mechanism for maintaining cell turgor. The molecular water transporter remained elusive until discovery of the Escherichia coli water channel, AqpZ, however the regulation of the aqpZ gene expression and physiological function of the AqpZ protein are unknown. Northern analysis revealed a transcript of 0.7 kb, confirming the monocistronic nature of aqpZ. Regulatory studies performed with an aqpZ∷lacZ low copy plasmid demonstrate enhanced expression during mid-logarithmic growth, and expression of the gene is dependent upon the extracellular osmolality, which increased in hypoosmotic environments but strongly reduced in hyperosmolar NaCl or KCl. While disruption of the chromosomal aqpZ is not lethal for E. coli, the colonies of the aqpZ knockout mutant are smaller than those of the parental wild-type strain. When cocultured with parental wild-type E. coli, the aqpZ knockout mutant exhibits markedly reduced colony formation when grown at 39°C. Similarly, the aqpZ knockout mutant also exhibits greatly reduced colony formation when grown at low osmolality, but this phenotype is reversed by overexpression of AqpZ protein. These results implicate AqpZ as a participant in the adaptive response of E. coli to hypoosmotic environments and indicate a requirement for AqpZ by rapidly growing cells.
Keywords: bacteria, water transport, osmoregulation, aquaporins
Although transport of water across cell membranes is fundamental to life, discovery of the aquaporin family of water channel proteins provided the first molecular explanation for this process (1). Presently eight aquaporins have been reported in mammals where they contribute to multiple physiological functions and clinical disorders (see review, ref. 2). Aquaporins have also been described in amphibia (3) and insects (4). Several dozen aquaporin DNAs have been found in plants, where they are believed to encode proteins involved in diverse functions, such as mediation of transpiration, maintenance of cell turgor, and inhibition of self pollination (5).
The first known prokaryotic aquaporin water channel gene, aqpZ, was identified in wild-type Escherichia coli. The functional characterization of AqpZ demonstrated water-selectivity with negligible glycerol transport (6), whereas the sequence-related protein GlpF exhibited the opposite specificity (7). The genomic organization of aqpZ has been defined in E. coli (8–10), and Southern blot analysis demonstrated cross-hybridizing bands in multiple Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (6). Genomic sequencing has uncovered aqpZ-like genes in Haemophilus influenzae (11); Mycoplasma genitalium, a prokaryote lacking a cell wall (12); and Synechocystis sp. PCC6803, a cyanobacterium permanently living in fresh water (13). The genetic mechanisms for regulating aqpZ and the physiological functions of the AqpZ protein remain undefined.
Movement of water across the cytoplasmic membrane is believed to be a part of the osmoregulatory response by which prokaryotes adjust cell turgor within the range needed for growth or survival (14, 15). Because of similarities shared with the plant and animal kingdoms, bacteria provide a model system for biochemical and genetic aspects of osmoregulation. E. coli is the most extensively studied prokaryotic osmoregulatory model, and multiple genes are controlled at the transcriptional level (14, 15). E. coli responds to hyperosmolar environments by accumulating organic osmolytes (compatible solutes) in the cytoplasm and by extruding inorganic ions. Hypoosmotic downshock results in a sudden influx of water into the bacterial cells, leading to an increase of intracellular pressure (14). In these conditions, bacteria remain viable and dissipate excessive turgor by jettisoning small osmolytes (16, 17).
Although various transporters have been postulated to respond to hyperosmotic stress, little is known about the molecular identities of genes activated by hypoosmotic stress. Neither the normal roles of bacterial water channels nor the consequences of the AqpZ null phenotype have been explored in the adaptive response to osmotic stress. Here we describe regulation of aqpZ gene expression and report a potential physiological function for the AqpZ protein.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions.
E. coli K-12 strains DH5α (18) and MC4100 (19) were used for cloning and expression studies. The E. coli K-12 rpoS mutant strain ZK1000 and its rpoS+ parent ZK126 (20) were kindly provided by Roberto Kolter, Harvard Medical School. The E. coli K-12 strain GM37 carries the osmoregulated Φ(proV-lacZ)(Hyb2)(λplacMu15) gene fusion in its chromosome (21). The E. coli MM294 (22) and SY327λpir (23) strains were used as wild-type and host for the mutant construction. The E. coli K-12 strains MM294-streptR (parental wild-type) and MM1211 (knockout, aqpZ∷lacZ-kan) were prepared in this study. The M9 minimal medium (24) was supplemented with 0.4% glucose, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2, and 0.2% casamino acids. Media included ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin at final concentrations of 50, 15 and 25 μg/ml. Osmolalities of the media were checked with a vapor pressure osmometer (Wescor 5100).
Plasmid Constructions.
An aqpZ∷lacZ gene fusion was prepared by inserting a promoterless lacZ-kan cassette (25) in frame with the fourth codon of an aqpZ coding region carrying 532 bp of its 5′-flanking region. The gene fusion construct was inserted into the EcoRV site of pcDNA I/amp (Invitrogen) yielding pANG532; pANG-PL was derived by deleting the 532 bp of the aqpZ 5′-flanking region. The suicide vector pZSV was derived from pCVD442 (23) by subcloning the aqpZ coding region surrounded by 1.774 kb of 5′-flanking and 0.7 kb of 3′-flanking DNA and mutated by the insertion of a lacZ-kan cassette into the BsmI site. The pBSK′ plasmid employed as control in the phenotypical studies was derived from pGC94q by releasing the PstI/KpnI fragment containing the whole aqpZ gene.
Northern Blot Analysis.
Total RNA (25 μg) extracted from MC4100 harvested at the mid-logarithmic phase of growth (OD578 = 0.7) was electrophoresed, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with the 32P-labeled aqpZ coding region.
β-Galactosidase Assays.
For the growth-phase control studies, DH5α or MC4100 cells carrying pANG532 were grown overnight and used to inoculate fresh M9 medium. Samples were harvested at intervals during exponential and stationary phases of growth, immediately diluted with M9, and plated to determine the number of colony forming units (cfu). At the same time, samples were pelleted, washed once with ice-cold Z-buffer (21), resuspended to OD578 = 0.5, and assayed for β-galactosidase (β-gal) activity, expressed as μmol of 2-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside cleaved per min per mg of protein (21). For studies of osmoregulation, fresh M9 media of various osmolalities were inoculated with overnight cultures of pANG532 or pANG-PL transformed into MC4100 or DH5α cells. When cultures reached OD578 = 0.7, aliquots were removed for cfu and β-gal assays.
Construction of the aqpZ Null Mutants.
The E. coli MM294-streptR strain was selected by plating a high-density suspension of parental strain MM294 on Luria–Bertani (LB)-streptomycin plates. Insertional disruption of aqpZ in MM294-streptR was performed by allelic exchange (23). E. coli SY327λ pir was electrotransformed with the plasmids pZSV, and transformants were selected with ampicillin. The plasmid was introduced into MM294-streptR from SY327λ pir by filter mating with selection for streptomycin and ampicillin resistance. Resulting exconjugates were also confirmed by kanamycin resistance. A resulting aqpZ knockout colony, MM1211, was confirmed by genomic Southern hybridization to contain the lacZ-kan cartridge in the aqpZ ORF. Southern analyses were performed at high stringency by hybridizing genomic DNAs with a DIG-labeled probe containing the entire aqpZ coding region.
Phenotypic Characterizations.
The cellular morphology of the MM1211 (knockout) was investigated by Gram staining of exponential and stationary phase liquid cultures. The thermic phenotype was determined by coculturing MM294-streptR (wild-type) and MM1211 at 25°C or at 39°C. Each series of experiments was repeated three to five times, and all cultures were tested in duplicate. Osmotic phenotypes were characterized as a time course of the ratio between the cell viabilities (cfu/ml of culture) of MM294-streptR and MM1211 cocultured in M9 minimal medium containing streptomycin at different osmolarities. A starting culture was prepared by inoculating 1.0 ml of M9 medium with single overnight colonies of MM294-streptR and MM1211 and then incubating for 3 hr at 37°C. The starting culture was used to inoculate M9 media at 80, 240, and 975 mosM that were simultaneously incubated at 37°C. Samples from each culture were collected, diluted, and plated on LB-streptomycin and LB-kanamycin to determine the cfu. The same protocol was followed in control experiments by coculturing pBSK′- and pGC94- transformed MM294-streptR and MM1211 in M9-ampicillin media (see above).
RESULTS
Growth Regulation of aqpZ Expression.
Northern blot analysis was undertaken to evaluate expression of aqpZ during the mid-logarithmic phase of growth. RNA from E. coli MC4100 cells was hybridized with a probe corresponding to the entire aqpZ ORF, and a distinct 0.7-kb transcript was identified (Fig. 1A).
Regulatory studies were performed with pANG532, carrying the aqpZ∷lacZ gene fusion inserted 12 bases downstream from the aqpZ ATG start codon. Because the 532 bp 5′-flanking region including the aqpZ promoter and cis-regulatory region were expected to drive lacZ, the plasmid pANG-PL that lacks the aqpZ 5′-flanking region was used as a control. When E. coli strains DH5α or MC4100 were transformed, pANG532 led to expression of an active hybrid β-gal with four AqpZ residues at the NH2 terminus. In each of four separate experiments, β-gal activity peaked during the mid-logarithmic phase of growth (OD578 ≈0.75), and declined to a lower level during late stationary phase (Fig. 1B). In contrast, negligible β-gal activity was detected in cells carrying pANG-PL.
Osmotic Regulation of aqpZ Expression.
E. coli were grown at mid-logarithmic phase in a series of steady-state osmotic conditions. Addition of NaCl to the M9 medium significantly reduced the level of β-gal activity measured with cultures of DH5α cells carrying pANG532. Up to a 30-fold decrease in β-gal activity was noted when cultures grown at 80 and 1,530 mosmol/kg H2O were compared. Cell survival is reduced at high osmolalities, but the reduction in β-gal activity was still striking after normalizing for cell viability at all osmolalities (Fig. 1C). Similar results were obtained with KCl and with a different E. coli strain, MC4100 (not shown). Downregulation of aqpZ by high external osmolality was not an artifact due to reduced copy numbers of pANG532, because no significant changes in the amount of this plasmid were found (not shown). In contrast, GM37, an E. coli strain carrying the proU∷lacZ fusion gene in its chromosome (26), was studied in parallel and demonstrated the anticipated positive induction by hyperosmolar exposure (Fig. 1C).
Genetic Analysis of the aqpZ Null Mutant.
Disruption of the aqpZ gene in the E. coli chromosome was undertaken by inserting a lacZ-kan cassette into the coding region, resulting in the aqpZ knockout strain, MM1211 (Fig. 2A). The construct was verified by genomic Southern analysis of the mutant and three wild-type E. coli strains: MC4100, MM294, and MM294-streptR. When chromosomal DNAs digested with BglI and AvaII were probed with the aqpZ ORF, an intense band of about 560 bp was detected with the wild-type DNAs, whereas a band of 420 bp was observed in the MM1211 lane (Fig. 2B). The weak band detected at 1.2 kb represents the fragment of DNA between the two BglI sites located 1,108 bp upstream and 109 bp downstream of the aqpZ ATG start codon. The 109-bp segment of the aqpZ ORF was not physically modified by the insertion. The construct was further verified by PCRs using primers overlapping regions of the aqpZ ORF located 225 bp upstream and and 135 bp downstream of the mutational insertion (not shown).
Phenotypic Analysis of the aqpZ Null Mutant.
In basal conditions, the MM1211 knockout strain grew in rich media (LB) and in minimal media (M9), demonstrating that disruption of the aqpZ gene is not lethal. Nevertheless, most MM1211 colonies were smaller than MM294-streptR, the parental wild-type (Fig. 3A). Few small colonies (1.38 ± 0.7%; n = 4) were present on the MM294-streptR plates, and only a few large colonies (1.42 ± 0.6%; n = 4) were present on the MM1211 plates. This phenotype was observed on selective as well as nonselective plates (not shown). Likewise, no apparent differences in cell morphology were observed with Gram stain in exponential or stationary phase liquid cultures grown in LB or M9 media (not shown).
To search for a relative growth phenotype, colony formation of mixed cultures of MM1211 (knockout) and MM294-streptR (wild-type) strains were compared at a temperature supporting a reduced growth rate (25°C) and at a temperature where the growth rate is maximum (39°C). While at 25°C the MM1211 strain exhibited 80% of colony formation of MM294-streptR strain, the MM1211 strain exhibited <15% of the colony formation at 39°C, indicating that expression of the aqpZ gene is linked to the rate of growth.
To further demonstrate the phenotypes, the viabilities of MM294-streptR (wild-type) and MM1211 (knockout) strains were compared in competition by coculturing in M9 media at different osmolarities. Striking reductions in the viability of the MM1211 strain relative to MM294-streptR were observed at 80 and 240 mosM, whereas no significant decrease in the cell viability was found at 975 mosM (Fig. 3C). The reduced growth in hypotonic media was ameliorated when the MM1211 strain was rescued by transformation with a high copy number plasmid (pGC94) containing the aqpZ gene (Fig. 3C).
DISCUSSION
Discovery of the aquaporin family of membrane water channels (1) has yielded a molecular understanding of membrane water transport and has led to a new set of challenges: (i) determination of the aquaporin protein structure at high resolution; (ii) identification of molecular controls for aquaporin gene regulation; (iii) elucidation of physiological functions by analysis of mutant aquaporin phenotypes. Mammalian and plant systems are highly complex, so recognition of an E. coli member of the aquaporin water channel family (6) has provided a prokaryotic model system for biophysical investigations, molecular studies of gene regulation, and evaluation of the physiological need for aquaporin-mediated water transport.
Cryoelectron microscopic studies of AQP1 reconstituted into two dimensional membrane crystals have revealed the structure of the protein at a resolution of 3–6 Å (see review, ref. 27). Nevertheless, it is not clear if significantly higher resolution studies can be obtained with glycosylated, partially degraded AQP1 purified from human red cells. In addition, the lack of a convenient heterologous expression system has prevented structural studies of other wild-type or mutagenized aquaporins by cryoelectron microscopy or x-ray diffraction of three-dimensional aquaporin crystals. Expression of AqpZ in E. coli may remedy these problems.
Analysis of the molecular genetic controls for expression of mammalian and plant aquaporins is proceeding, however, the inability to reproducibly induce expression of most known aquaporins in culture systems has obscured the significance of published studies. Here we document the expression of aqpZ in E. coli by Northern analysis (Fig. 1A). The recent determination of the organization of the aqpZ gene in E. coli predicted that it is a monocistronic message (8, 10). As shown here, the size of the 0.7-kb transcript (Fig. 1A) coincides closely to the predicted size coding sequence of aqpZ plus transcribed flanking DNA (693 + 30 + 8 bp). This contrasts with the sequence-related gene glpF that encodes a glycerol transport protein in an operon also containing genes that encode glycerol metabolizing enzymes (7, 28). Moreover, the lack of differences in aqpZ expression in rpoS+ and rpoS− E. coli (not shown) and the decline during stationary phase growth (Fig. 1B) indicate that RpoS is not involved.
The issue of whether aquaporins are essential for life is debated. As reviewed (2), mammalian aquaporin mutants have been identified with phenotypes including lens cataracts (AQP0), loss of the red cell Co blood group antigens (AQP1), nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (AQP2), and incomplete renal concentration (AQP4). Nonmammalian aquaporin-related phenotypes have been identified in other species including Drosophila (big brain) (29), and plants (increased root mass and inhibition of self pollination) (30). The mutant phenotypes of microbial genes encoding sequence-related glycerol transporters are not as severe. Mutations in the bacterial gene glpF result in only a subtle reduction of membrane permeability (31), while mutations in the yeast homolog FPS1 exhibit somewhat reduced glycerol efflux (32).
Before dismissing an aquaporin as physiologically nonessential, careful testing of possible conditional phenotypes is needed. Our first evaluations of the aqpZ knockout failed to reveal a distinct phenotype. Subsequently, clues generated with the aqpZ∷lacZ plasmid led us to evaluate the aqpZ knockout for reduced colony formation in conditions of maximum growth (Fig. 3B) and in hypoosmotic media (Fig. 3C). While peak aqpZ expression coincides with the mid-logarithmic growth phase, this is not likely to simply reflect a need for increased bulk water uptake for volume expansion during rapid growth. Assuming a 20–30 min generation time, cell volume of ≈1 μm3, and surface area of ≈5 μm2, the doubling of bacterial volume could easily be provided by the diffusional water permeability of simple lipid bilayers, Pd from 2–50 μm/sec, (33), especially because the surface-to-volume ratio is much higher for bacteria than mammalian cells. Diffusional water permeability is known to have a high Arrhenius activation energy (≈10 kcal/mol), so water permeability should be maximum at the highest temperatures, suggesting that aquaporins would be less important. This contrasts with the observed greater need for AqpZ in E. coli grown at 39°C rather than 25°C. Moreover, if flaccidity is deleterious to bacteria, the presence of aquaporins would not be desired in hyperosmolar environments. Consistent with this, our studies of hyperosmolar environments demonstrated that the expression of the aqpZ gene is strongly reduced (Fig. 1C), and the aqpZ knockout suffers no growth deficit (Fig. 3C).
Together these observations all suggest that bacterial aquaporins are needed for rapid movements of water rather than slower movements of large volumes of water. Interestingly, a gene with a striking sequence-identity to the E. coli aqpZ has been recently identified in the chromosome of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803, a cyanobacterium permanently living in fresh water (9, 13). While additional roles for the AqpZ protein are probably still unknown, our studies lead us to propose that the physiological significance of AqpZ for the bacterium is that it permits the maintenance of cell turgor while facilitating volume expansion. Thus while sufficient water for cell division may be absorbed by simple membrane diffusion over the course of several minutes, maintenance of high intracellular turgor will require the fast entry of water into the cytoplasm as the cavity formed by the bacterial cell wall increases during rapid growth.
Acknowledgments
This work is dedicated to the memory of Jorge Chevesich, Ph.D. (1955–1997), exemplary friend and scientist. We thank Drs. Angela Ludovico, Susanne Kneip, Giovanna Valenti, Antonietta Monte, Maria Svelto, Kenn Rudd, and Paul Blount for important discussions, and Drs. Mary Berlyn, Roberto Kolter, and Michael Donnenberg for bacterial strains. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants (P.A., W.R.B.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (E.B.), and Foundation pour la Recherche Médicale and Bourse de formation à l’étranger Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (M.B.).
ABBREVIATIONS
- cfu
colony-forming units, β-gal, β-galactosidase
- LB
Luria–Bertani
References
- 1.Preston G M, Piazza-Carroll T, Guggino W B, Agre P. Science. 1992;256:385–387. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5055.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.King L S, Agre P. Annu Rev Physiol. 1996;58:619–648. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.58.030196.003155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abrami L, Simon M, Rousselet G, Berthonaud V, Bühler J M, Ripoche P. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1192:147–151. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(94)90155-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Le Cahèrec F, Deschamps S, Delamarche C, Pellerin I, Bonnec G, Guillam M T, Thomas D, Gouranton J, Hubert J F. Eur J Biochem. 1996;241:707–715. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.00707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weig A, Deswarte C, Chrispeels M J. Plant Physiol. 1997;114:1347–1357. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.4.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Calamita G, Bishai W R, Preston G M, Guggino W B, Agre P. J Biol Chem. 1995;49:29063–29066. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.49.29063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maurel C, Reizer J, Schroeder J I, Chrispeels M J, Saier M H., Jr J Biol Chem. 1994;269:11869–11872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oshima T, Aiba H, Baba T, Fujita K, Hayashi K, Honjo A, Ikemoto K, Inada T, Itoh T, Kajihara M, et al. DNA Res. 1996;3:137–155. doi: 10.1093/dnares/3.3.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Calamita G, Kempf B, Rudd K, Bonhivers M, Kneip S, Bishai W R, Bremer E, Agre P. Biol Cell. 1997;89:321–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blattner F R, Plunkett G, III, Bloch C A, Perna N T, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner J D, Rode C K, Mayhew G F, et al. Science. 1997;277:1453–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fleischmann R D, Adams M D, White O, Clayton R A, Kirkness E F, Kerlavage A R, Bult C J, Tomb J, Dougherthy B A, Merrick J M, et al. Science. 1995;269:496–512. doi: 10.1126/science.7542800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fraser C M, Gocayne J D, White O, Adams M D, Clayton R A, Fleischmann R D, Bult C J, Kerlavage A R, Sutton G, Kelley J M, et al. Science. 1995;270:397–403. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaneko T, Sato S, Kotani H, Tanaka A, Asamizu E, Nakamura Y, Miyajima N, Hirosawa M, Sugiura M, Sasamoto S, et al. DNA Res. 1996;3:109–136. doi: 10.1093/dnares/3.3.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Csonka L N, Hanson A D. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1991;45:569–606. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.45.100191.003033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lucht J M, Bremer E. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994;14:3–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tsapis A, Kepes A. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977;469:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(77)90320-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Schleyer M, Schmid R, Bakker E P. Arch Microbiol. 1993;160:424–431. doi: 10.1007/BF00245302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hanahan D. J Mol Biol. 1983;166:557–562. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80284-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Casabadan M J. J Mol Biol. 1976;104:541–555. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bohannon D E, Connell N, Keener J, Tormo A, Espinosa-Urgel M, Zambrano M M, Kolter R. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:4482–4492. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.14.4482-4492.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.May G, Faatz E, Villarejo M, Bremer E. Mol Gen Genet. 1986;205:225–233. doi: 10.1007/BF00430432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meselson M, Yuan R. Nature (London) 1968;217:1110–1114. doi: 10.1038/2171110a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Donnenberg M S, Kaper J B. Infect Immun. 1991;59:4310–4317. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.12.4310-4317.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T E. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd Ed. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tiedeman A A, Smith J M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:3587. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.8.3587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lucht J M, Bremer E. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:801–809. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.801-809.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Heymann, J. B., Agre P., Fujiyoshi Y. & Engel A. (1998) J. Struct. Biol. 116, in press.
- 28.Sweet G, Gandor C, Voegele R, Wittekindt N, Beuerle J, Truniger V, Lin E C C, Boos W. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:424–430. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.1.424-430.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rao Y, Jan L Y, Jan Y N. Nature (London) 1990;345:163–167. doi: 10.1038/345163a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ideda S, Nasrallah J B, Dixit R, Preiss S, Nasrallah M E. Science. 1997;276:1564–1566. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5318.1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Truniger V, Boos W, Sweet G. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:6981–6991. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.21.6981-6991.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Luyten K, Albertyn J, Skibbe W F, Prior B A, Ramos J, Thevelein J M, Hohmann S. EMBO J. 1995;14:1360–1371. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07122.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Haines T H. FEBS Lett. 1994;346:115–122. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00470-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]