Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;1(4):263–276. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2005.1.4.263

Table 3.

Summary of randomized controlled trials of sirolimus-eluting stent vs bare metal stent

RAVEL SIRIUS E-SIRIUS C-SIRIUS




Sirolimus (n = 120) Control (n = 118) Sirolimus (n = 533) Control (n = 525) Sirolimus (n = 175) Control (n = 177) Sirolimus (n = 50) Control (n = 50)
Mean lesion length (mm) 9.56 9.61 14.4 14.4 14.9 15.1 14.5 12.6
Mean RVD (mm) 2.6 2.64 2.79 2.81 2.6 2.51 2.65 2.62
Angiographic follow-up 6 mon 9 mon 9 mon 9 mon
Mean late luminal loss* (mm) −0.01 0.80 0.24 0.81 0.19 0.80 0.12 0.79
Binary restenosis(%) 0 26.6 8.9 36.3 5.9 42.3 2.3 52.3
Subacute stent thrombosis (%) 0 0 0.4 0.8 1.1 0 2.0 2.0
TVR (%) 0 26 3.4 4.8 4.0 20.9
TLR (%) 0 23.7 4.1 16.6 4.0 20.9 4.0 18.0
Overall MACE (%) 5.8 28.8 7.1 18.9 8.0 22.6 4.0 18.3

Abbreviations: RAVEL, Randomized study with sirolimus-eluting Velocity balloon-expandable stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesion; SIRIUS, Sirolimus-coated BX Velocity stent in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions; E- & C-SIRIUS, European- & Canadian-SIRIUS; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; mon, months; RVD, reference vessel diameter; TLR, target lesion revascularization; TVR, target vessel revascularization.

note: All mean late luminal loss were in-segment except for RAVEL which was in-stent.