Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep;2(3):221–237. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.3.221

Table 1.

Prognostic value of CRP in primary prevention

Study n Endpoint Cutoff Risk estimates
Ridker, Rifai, et al 2000 28 Death/MI/stroke/revasc >8.5 mg/L vs <0.6 mg/L RR=1.5
263
Harris et al 1999 1293 Death ≥2.78 mg/L RR=1.6
Ridker et al 1997 543 MI ≥2.11 mg/L vs ≤0.55 mg/L RR=2.9
Ischemic stroke ≥2.11 mg/L vs ≤0.55 mg/L RR=1.9
Tracy et al 1997 5201 MI >2.79 mg/L vs <0.97 mg/L RR=2.67
Ridker, Hennekens, et al 1998 122 Death/MI/stroke/revasc >7.3 mg/L vs <1.5 mg/L RR=4.8
MI/stroke >7.3 mg/L vs <1.5 mg/L RR=7.3
Ridker, Glynn, et al 1998 144 PAD 2.1 mg/L vs 0.55 mg/L RR=2.1
Koeing et al 1999 936 CV Death/MI 6.6 mg/L vs 0.4 mg/L RR=2.4
Danesh et al 2000 1531 CHD >2.4 mg/L vs <0.9 mg/L RR=2.13
Mendall et al 2000 1395 CHD <0.83 mg/L vs >3.87 mg/L p=ns
CV Death p=ns
All cause mortality p=0.0033
Danesh et al 2004 6428 CHD >2.0 mg/L vs <0.78 mg/L RR=1.45

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary artery disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; CV Death, fatal acute myocardial infarction or sudden death; MI, myocardial infarction; Revasc, revascularization; RR, relative risk; PAD, peripheral arterial disease.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure