Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 30;68(5):1402–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.037

Table 1.

Dosimetric comparison of IMRT and conventional (Std) spinal fields

Patient %Vol. by 95% Dose %Vol. > 110% Dose Min (%) in Cord Band Max (%) in Cord Band Mean in Cord Band Max in Patient Body (%)
IMRT Std IMRT Std IMRT Std IMRT Std IMRT Std IMRT Std
1 98.5 91 2.4 5.5 82.9 86.5 112 114 104 103 138.2 127.2
2 92.9 80.8 0 3.5 76 55.4 108.8 112.6 101.2 100.7 130.6 119.8
3 95.6 94 0 1.9 76.6 86.9 109.6 112.4 102 102.9 128.7 119.4
4 95 83.3 0 18.7 80.2 77.2 108.7 117.1 100.7 103 137.7 122.3
5 98.1 89.7 8.2 30.3 82.1 83 113.5 121.9 105.1 105.4 146.1 134.9
6 98 89.2 2.5 2.1 80.3 72.5 112.9 111.4 104.3 102.7 118.1 124.2
7 94.8 91.5 0 4.2 80.2 87.8 109.8 114.5 101.3 101.4 130.5 121.5
8 94 78.8 0.1 2.4 77.8 79.7 110.3 112.8 101.6 99.8 134.4 120.8
9 94.7 83.7 2.3 14.8 77.3 66.5 111.1 126.8 101.6 101.9 146.3 143.3
10 90.4 86.3 0 3.5 71.6 67 103 115.3 100 100.8 122.1 117.5
11 97.6 93.4 0 2.5 81.9 80.5 109.5 112.9 102.3 103.4 133.5 121.4