Table 1 Comparison of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Constrictive pericarditis | Restrictive cardiomyopathy | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Most common aetiology | Idiopathic | Idiopathic | ||
Post‐cardiac surgery | ||||
Radiotherapy | Infiltrative; amyloidosis, eosinophilic diseases | |||
Connective tissue disease | ||||
Infection/tuberculosis | Radiotherapy | |||
Malignancy | ||||
Clinical symptoms | Dyspnoea, fatigue, peripheral oedema, ascites | Dyspnoea, fatigue | ||
Peripheral oedema | ||||
Pulsus paradoxus | Uncommon | Absent | ||
JVP height | Elevated | Elevated | ||
JVP waveform | Prominent X and Y descents | Prominent X descent | ||
Kussmaul's sign | Often present | Absent | ||
Pericardial knock | Often present | Absent | ||
ECG | Low voltage QRS complexes in amyloidosis | |||
Atrial size | Usually normal | Dilated | ||
LV and RV size/systolic function/2D appearance | Usually normal | Normal or mildly reduced LV systolic function | ||
Increased LV wall thickness | Absent | May be present in infiltrative causes | ||
Septal motion | Abnormal | Normal | ||
Septal position | Respiratory variation | Normal | ||
Mitral/tricuspid regurgitation | Infrequent | Frequent (TR>MR) | ||
Mitral inflow pattern PW Doppler | Increased E velocity | Increased E velocity | ||
Shortened deceleration time | Restrictive filling pattern | |||
Mitral E/A ratio often >2.0 | Mitral E/A ratio >2.0, shortened DT (<160 ms) | |||
Respiratory variation | Exaggerated and reciprocal respiratory changes in Doppler inflows; increased right sided Doppler velocities (tricuspid, pulmonary valve) and reduced left sided Doppler velocities (mitral, aortic) with inspiration. Opposite changes occur with expiration. | Normal with minimal respiratory variation of Doppler inflows | ||
Percentage change from expiration to inspiration: †mitral E velocity >–25% (–33 (9)%), aortic velocity –14 (5)%, tricuspid E velocity 44 (22)%, pulmonary artery velocity 16 (4%)19 | Percentage change from first beat of expiration to first beat of inspiration: †mitral E velocity –3% (4)%, tricuspid E velocity 17 (16)%, aortic velocity –4 (5)%, pulmonary artery velocity 5% (7)%19 | |||
IVRT | Duration increases from expiration to inspiration, increased respiratory variation IVRT >25% (50 (14)%)†19 | Constant throughout respiration, minimal respiratory variation of IVRT duration 4 (7)%†19 | ||
Pulmonary vein PW Doppler | Increased respiratory variation of diastolic pulmonary vein Doppler flow >18%20 | No significant respiratory variation | ||
IVC | Dilated IVC | Dilated IVC | ||
<50% reduction in IVC width with inspiration | <50% reduction in IVC width with inspiration | |||
Hepatic vein | Prominent diastolic flow reversals in expiration | Prominent diastolic atrial flow reversals in inspiration | ||
SVC Doppler | Diastolic prominence of forward flow (reduced systolic forward flow) | Diastolic prominence of forward flow (reduced systolic forward flow) | ||
Pulmonary hypertension | Rare and mild | Frequent and moderate‐severe elevation | ||
Colour M mode propagation velocity (first aliasing contour) | Normal to increased >100 cm/s20 | Reduced (<100 cm/s)20 | ||
Tissue Doppler; mitral annulus | Normal to increased E' velocity >8 cm/s20 | Reduced E' velocity <8 cm/s20 | ||
CXR | Pericardial calcification | No pericardial calcification | ||
Pericardium thickness on CT/MRI imaging | Increased | Normal | ||
BNP | Normal to minimally elevated 128 (53) pg/ml23 | Notably elevated 826 (172) pg/ml23 | ||
Catheterisation haemodynamics | Elevation and near equalisation of all diastolic pressures* | Elevation and near equalisation of all diastolic pressures* | ||
LVEDP‐RVEDP ⩽5 mm Hg* | LVEDP‐RVEDP >5 mmHg* | |||
PASP ⩽55 mm Hg* | PASP >40 mm Hg* | |||
RVEDP/RVSP >1/3* | RVEDP/RVSP <1/3* | |||
Dissociation of intracardiac and intrathoracic pressures with increased respiratory variation between the PCWP and early diastolic LV pressure gradient ⩾5 mm Hg22 (fig 3A) | ||||
Increased ventricular interdependence; discordant changes of LV systolic pressure and RV systolic pressure with respiration22 (fig 3B) | ||||
Endomyocardial biopsy | Usually normal myocardium | Abnormal or non‐specific | ||
Treatment | Pericardectomy | Medical treatment | ||
± treatment of underlying disorder | ||||
± cardiac transplantation |
BNP, B‐type natriuretic peptide; CT, computed tomography; CXR, chest x ray; ECG, electrocardiogram; IVC, inferior vena cava; IVRT, left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time; JVP, jugular venous pressure; LV, left ventricle; LVEDP, left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure; MR, mitral regurgitation; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PASP, pulmonary artery systolic pressure; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; PW, pulsed wave; RV, right ventricle; RVEDP, right ventricular end‐diastolic pressure; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; SVC, superior vena cava; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.
This table presents an outline of parameters which can be useful in differentiating the above two conditions, but in the individual patient discordant data can occur, and the overall distinction should be based on an overall assessment.
*Suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of these criteria may limit the clinical usefulness in individual patients.
†Percentage change from the first beat of expiration to the first beat of inspiration. Values are presented as mean (SD). All p values are <0.05 comparing percentage respiratory change in constrictive pericarditis versus restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis versus normal.19 The respiratory variation (%) represents a continuum and cut‐offs are not absolute; –% indicates a negative direction of change.