Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Sep 27.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Oct 15;160(8):774–783. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh282

TABLE 5.

Associations* of frequency of total seafood intake with birth weight, fetal growth, and length of gestation: data from pregnant women from Massachusetts enrolled in Project Viva, 1999–2002

Frequency of total seafood intake Δ Birth weight
Δ Fetal growth
Δ Length of gestation
Grams 95% CI z value 95% CI Days 95% CI
First trimester (n = 1,797)
 No intake (n = 233) 70 −18, 158 0.13 −0.01, 0.28 −0.8 −2.7, 1.1
 Tertile 1 (n = 597) 48 −21, 117 0.08 −0.03, 0.20 0.2 −1.3, 1.7
 Tertile 2 (n = 568) 7 −62, 77 −0.01 −0.12, 0.10 −0.4 −2.0, 1.1
 Tertile 3 (n = 399)
p§ for trend 0.05 0.02 0.99
Second trimester (n = 1,663)
 No intake (n = 215) 21 −64, 105 0.09 −0.06, 0.24 0.5 −1.3, 2.3
 Tertile 1 (n = 564) 39 −27, 105 0.06 −0.05, 0.18 0.1 −1.3, 1.4
 Tertile 2 (n = 493) −29 −96, 38 −0.05 −0.17, 0.07 −0.8 −2.2, 0.6
 Tertile 3 (n = 391)
p§ for trend 0.19 0.08 0.55
*

Effect estimates were adjusted for enrollment site, infant sex, and maternal age, height, intrapartum weight gain, prepregnancy body mass index, race/ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, education, and gravidity, all in categories as shown in table 1.

The lowest group reported consuming none/<1 serving of seafood per month; the remaining subjects were divided into tertiles, with the highest intake group used as the referent.

CI, confidence interval.

§

Two-sided p value.