Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2005 Oct;54(4):918–928. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20633

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9

Comparison of im'ages of calf acquired using conventional FISP and S5FP pulse sequences with various train-lengths. The S5FP images employed opening and closing subsequences of 5 pulses and 1 pulse, respectively, a water-fat separation angle of 90°, and RF spoiling between successive SSFP trains.