Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Jun 12;101(8):766–772. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.04.016

Table 4.

Association of geophagia preference with Ascaris and/or Trichuris and hookworm at baseline, adjusted for possible confounders

Trichuris (n = 970)
Ascaris (n = 970)
Hookworm (n = 970)
OR a 95% CI P-value OR a 95% CI P-value OR a 95% CI P-value
Geophagia during current pregnancy (none as referent) 1.03 0.567–1.850 0.919 1.45 0.492–4.283 0.499 1.74 0.965–3.154 0.066
Age (years) 0.98* 0.956–0.996 0.031 0.97 0.933–1.018 0.248 0.98 0.963–1.004 0.106
Urban (rural as referent) 1.24* 0.987–1.458 0.036 0.96 0.597–1.543 0.865 0.60* 0.482–0.742 <0.001
No. of durable goods (0–4) 0.98 0.817–1.088 0.771 0.90 0.662–1.215 0.482 0.92 0.785–1.068 0.263
Pit toilet in household (none as referent) 0.49* 0.320–0.684 <0.001 0.33* 0.130–0.823 0.018 0.65* 0.449–0.969 0.028
Formal education (none as referent) 0.65* 0.492–0.906 0.007 0.62 0.330–1.168 0.140 0.61* 0.450–0.838 0.002
a

Odds ratios calculated from logistic regression.

*

P < 0.05.