Skip to main content
. 2006 Sep 8;60(7):816–819. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.040840

Table 2 Summary of results from participating laboratories for the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) pilot HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) scheme.

Results Appropriate Acceptable Inappropriate Misdiagnosis
SK‐BR‐3
Run 1 22 (9) 10 8 4 0
Run 2 27 (5) 9 10 8 0
Run 3 29 (2) 16 3 10 (1NR) 1
Total 78 (16) 35 21 20 1
MDA‐MB‐453
Run 1 22 (9) 13 3 6 2* (<1.8–2.0)
Run 2 27 (5) 17 3 7 6
Run 3 29 (2) 15 6 8 3
Total 78 (16) 45 12 21 11
BT20/MDA‐MB‐175*
Run 1 22 (9) 16 2 4 1
Run 2 27 (5) 14 5 8 0
Run 3 29 (2) 10 10 9 (3 NR) 0
Total 78 (16) 40 17 21 1
MDA‐MB‐231
Run 1 22 (9) 20 2 0 0
Run 2 27 (5) 25 1 1 0
Run 3 29 (2) 20 4 5 (2 NR) 0
Total 78 (16) 65 7 6 0

Distribution of results from participating laboratories over three runs during 2004/05 as assessed by results from reference laboratories.

Results  =  number of participating laboratories submitting results. Of participating laboratories, 22 participated in run 1, 25 in run 2 and 29 in run 3; figures in brackets represent those participating laboratories which did not submit results for that run (e.g. in run 1, 22 laboratories submitted results and 9 did not).

Results were scored as either “appropriate” (falling within the range identified by the reference laboratories), “acceptable” (falling within 10% of the range identified by the reference laboratories), “inappropriate” (falling outside the range ±10% identified by reference laboratories but not resulting in a misdiagnosis), or “misdiagnosis” (falling outside the above range and resulting in a possible “misdiagnosis” of the case in question).

*BT20 was used in run 1 and MDA‐MB‐175 was used for runs 2 and 3.