Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep;5(5):387–394. doi: 10.1370/afm.721

Table 3.

Analysis of Covariance: Objective Communication Subscores in Relation to Family Physician’s Intervention Status

Intervention (n=8) Control (n=9)
Family Physicians Mean Score (SD) CI Mean Score (SD) CI P Value
Building relationships
    Exploration of illness experience 65.0 (5.07) 57.85–71.68 56.3 (11.44) 50.04–63.08 .09
    Validation of patients’ illness experience 79.1 (14.78) 67.54–91.39 71.7 (15.48) 60.13–82.59 .31
    Offering support, %* 77.8 (n/a) 22.2 (n/a) .02
Sharing information
    Physician description and patient response 86.3 (18.29) 71.78–101.56 66.3 (19.23) 51.93–79.96 .05
Creating an experience of control
    Mutual discussion of management plan 68.8 (45.81) 39.13–98.36 62.2 (31.26) 34.30–90.15 .74
Mastering the whole person experience
    Exploration of whole person issues 82.8 (9.81) 69.12–92.34 58.7 (18.33) 49.60–71.39 .02
    Validation of whole person issues 77.0 (15.97) 58.04–93.43 49.1 (26.31) 33.61–66.86 .05
Total score 75.6 (14.73) 62.90–84.99 60.2 (15.27) 51.29–72.07 .11

Note: Analysis controlling for baseline objective communication score. Total score and each subscore ranged from 0 to 100.

* The support score is the only one expressed as a percentage, not a continuous variable.