Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2007 Jun 28;32(11):2529–2548. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.017

Table 5.

Tests of mediation of behavioral strategies on drinking volume and drinking frequency

Model 1: Tests of mediation for behavioral strategies on drinking volume B SE B β Model
Adj. R2 F
Step A: Intervention effect on behavioral strategies 2.47 1.08 0.16* 0.02 5.26*
Step B: Intervention effect on drinks per drinking day −0.79 0.38 −0.15* 0.02 4.29*
Step C: Behavioral strategies effect on drinks per drinking day −0.07 0.03 −0.21** 0.04 7.95**
Final step: Effect of behavioral strategies and intervention on drinks per drinking day
 Behavioral strategies −0.07 0.03 −0.19* 0.05 5.24**
 Intervention −0.63 0.40 −0.12
Model 2: Tests of mediation for behavioral strategies on drinking frequency B SE B β Model
Adj. R2 F
Step A: Intervention effect on behavioral strategies 2.47 1.08 0.16** 0.03 5.26*
Step B: Intervention effect on number of drinking days 1.41 0.65 0.15* 0.02 4.70*
Step C: Behavioral strategies effect on number of drinking days −0.03 0.05 −0.04 0.00 0.35
Final step: Effect of behavioral strategies and intervention on drinks per drinking day N/A
 Behavioral strategies
 Intervention

Note. For intervention, 0 = CDI and 1 = BMI. N/A = Not Applicable since an earlier step in the mediational analyses was not significant. The drinks per drinking day variable was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, so a positive difference score indicates an increase in the behavior. The number of drinking days variable was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, so a positive difference score indicates an increase in the behavior. The behavioral strategies measure was calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 3-month score so a positive difference score indicates an increase in use of strategies.

*

p< 05.

**

p < .01