Table 5.
Tests of mediation of behavioral strategies on drinking volume and drinking frequency
Model 1: Tests of mediation for behavioral strategies on drinking volume | B | SE B | β | Model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adj. R2 | F | ||||
Step A: Intervention effect on behavioral strategies | 2.47 | 1.08 | 0.16* | 0.02 | 5.26* |
Step B: Intervention effect on drinks per drinking day | −0.79 | 0.38 | −0.15* | 0.02 | 4.29* |
Step C: Behavioral strategies effect on drinks per drinking day | −0.07 | 0.03 | −0.21** | 0.04 | 7.95** |
Final step: Effect of behavioral strategies and intervention on drinks per drinking day | |||||
Behavioral strategies | −0.07 | 0.03 | −0.19* | 0.05 | 5.24** |
Intervention | −0.63 | 0.40 | −0.12 | ||
Model 2: Tests of mediation for behavioral strategies on drinking frequency | B | SE B | β | Model | |
Adj. R2 | F | ||||
Step A: Intervention effect on behavioral strategies | 2.47 | 1.08 | 0.16** | 0.03 | 5.26* |
Step B: Intervention effect on number of drinking days | 1.41 | 0.65 | 0.15* | 0.02 | 4.70* |
Step C: Behavioral strategies effect on number of drinking days | −0.03 | 0.05 | −0.04 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
Final step: Effect of behavioral strategies and intervention on drinks per drinking day | N/A | ||||
Behavioral strategies | |||||
Intervention |
Note. For intervention, 0 = CDI and 1 = BMI. N/A = Not Applicable since an earlier step in the mediational analyses was not significant. The drinks per drinking day variable was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, so a positive difference score indicates an increase in the behavior. The number of drinking days variable was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 12-month value, so a positive difference score indicates an increase in the behavior. The behavioral strategies measure was calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 3-month score so a positive difference score indicates an increase in use of strategies.
p< 05.
p < .01