. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Oct 4.

Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Oct;40(5):1073–1084. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4005.1073

Table 2. Confusion matrices Judge 1 (side) against Judge 2 (top).

In the top section counts of words assigned to F, P, R and O categories are shown. This matrix is decomposed into the separate F × P, F × R and F × O confusion matrices in the following section.

Overall
			Judge 2
		F	P	R	O
	F	3700	205	14	116
	P	8	82	2	3
Judge 1
	R	2	13	181	20
	O	70	24	4	56
Overall agreement = 89.3%