Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 19;104(39):15218–15223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702319104

Table 2.

Significance of one-way ANOVA tests to examine associations between tenure regime and other attributes

Attributes of
Relationship between
Resource User group Governance system User group and resource Governance system and resource
Tenure regime and steepness of terrain: P = 0.022* Tenure regime and group size: P < 0.000* Tenure regime and monitoring: P = 0.011 Tenure regime and distance of settlement from forest: P = 0.282 Tenure regime and vegetation planting: P < 0.000*
Tenure regime and social capital: P = 0.581
Tenure regime and forest size: P < 0.000* Tenure regime and group size/forest area ratio: P = 0.109 Tenure regime and disruptive conflict: P = 0.020* Tenure regime and dependence on forest: P < 0.000* Tenure regime and forest maintenance activities: P = 0.208
Tenure regime and forest quality: P = 0.002* Tenure regime and leadership: P = 0.185 Tenure regime and adoption of new technologies that reduce pressure on the forest: P = 0.007*
Tenure regime and involvement of users in making the rules: P = 0.935 Tenure regime and regulation of pressure by harvesting outside the forest: P = 0.026*

*Significance at P < 0.05.