Table 2.
Significance of one-way ANOVA tests to examine associations between tenure regime and other attributes
| Attributes of |
Relationship between |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resource | User group | Governance system | User group and resource | Governance system and resource |
| Tenure regime and steepness of terrain: P = 0.022* | Tenure regime and group size: P < 0.000* | Tenure regime and monitoring: P = 0.011 | Tenure regime and distance of settlement from forest: P = 0.282 | Tenure regime and vegetation planting: P < 0.000* |
| Tenure regime and social capital: P = 0.581 | ||||
| Tenure regime and forest size: P < 0.000* | Tenure regime and group size/forest area ratio: P = 0.109 | Tenure regime and disruptive conflict: P = 0.020* | Tenure regime and dependence on forest: P < 0.000* | Tenure regime and forest maintenance activities: P = 0.208 |
| Tenure regime and forest quality: P = 0.002* | Tenure regime and leadership: P = 0.185 | Tenure regime and adoption of new technologies that reduce pressure on the forest: P = 0.007* | ||
| Tenure regime and involvement of users in making the rules: P = 0.935 | Tenure regime and regulation of pressure by harvesting outside the forest: P = 0.026* | |||
*Significance at P < 0.05.