Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 10;64(3):317–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02890.x

Table 4.

Comparison of exenatide clearance and dose–weight normalized AUC0–∞ and Cmax between each renal impairment group (mild, moderate and ESRD) and the healthy control group

Renal function group n LS geometric mean LS geometric mean ratio renal group/healthy (90% CI) P-value
AUC0–∞ (pg h ml−1)/(µg kg−1) Healthy 8 19 917
Mild RI 8 16 036 0.81 (0.66, 0.98) 0.066
Moderate RI* 6 19 258 0.97 (0.77, 1.21) 0.801
ESRD 8 67 102 3.37 (2.80, 4.06) <0.001
Cmax (pg ml−1)/(µg kg−1) Healthy 8 5 392
Mild RI 8 3 650 0.68 (0.49, 0.93) 0.047
Moderate RI* 6 3 507 0.65 (0.45, 0.94) 0.060
ESRD 8 7 434 1.38 (1.01, 1.88) 0.088
CLp/F (l h−1) Healthy 8 3.64
Mild RI 8 4.72 1.30 (1.02, 1.66) 0.08
Moderate RIa 6 4.07 1.12 (0.84, 1.49) 0.52
ESRD 8 0.94 0.26 (0.20, 0.33) ≤0.001
*

One subject receiving 10 µg was excluded as an outlier due to atypically low concentrations. ESRD, End-stage renal disease; RI, renal impairment.