Table 4.
Summary of models evaluating the effect of covariates on the pharmacokinetic parameters of indinavir
| Run model | Objective function value | DOFa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Base model | 2963 | – | |
| Intermediate model | ||||
| CL/F | ||||
| 2 | with and without ritonavir* | θ1 × RTV + (1 − RTV) θ6 | 2940 | 22 |
| 3 | MDR1 3435C>T | θ1 × 3435CC + θ6 × 3435CT + θ7 × 3435TT | 2956 | 7 |
| 4 | MDR1 2677G>T | θ1 × 2677GG + θ6 × 2677GT + θ7 × 2677TT | 2962 | 1 |
| 5 | CYP3A5 *1/*3 (6986A>G) | θ1 × 6986AG + θ6 × 6986GG | 2962 | 1 |
| 6 | CYP3A5 27050A>G | θ1 × 27050AA + θ6 × 27050AG | 2963 | 0 |
| 7 | CYP3A5 31611C>T | θ1 × 31611CC + θ6 × 31611CT | 2962 | 1 |
| ka | ||||
| 8 | MDR1 3435C>T | θ3 × 3435CC + θ6 × 3435CT + θ7 × 3435TT | 2945 | 17 |
| 9 | MDR1 2677G>T | θ3 × 2677GG + θ6 × 2677GT + θ7 × 2677TT | 2957 | 5 |
| 10 | CYP3A5 *1/*3 (6986A>G) | θ3 × 6986AG + θ6 × 6986GG | 2962 | 1 |
| 11 | CYP3A5 27050A>G | θ3 × 27050AA + θ6 × 27050AG | 2963 | 0 |
| 12 | CYP3A5 31611C>T | θ3 × 31611CC + θ6 × 31611CT | 2960 | 3 |
| V/F | ||||
| 13 | MDR1 3435C>T | θ2 × 3435CC + θ6 × 3435CT + θ7 × 3435TT | 2962 | 1 |
| 14 | MDR1 2677G>T | θ2 × 2677GG + θ6 × 2677GT + θ7 × 2677TT | 2962 | 0 |
| 15 | CYP3A5 *1/*3 (6986A>G) | θ2 × 6986AG + θ6 × 6986GG | 2962 | 1 |
| 16 | CYP3A5 27050A>G | θ2 × 27050AA + θ6 × 27050AG | 2958 | 5 |
| 17 | CYP3A5 31611C>T | θ2 × 31611CC + θ6 × 31611CT | 2962 | 0 |
| Final model | ||||
| 18 | CL/F (RTV) and ka (MDR-1 3435) | 2927 | 14** |
decrease of objective function
best intermediate model
DOF from best intermediate model; CL/F clearance; V/F volume of distribution; ka,rate of absorption constant.