Skip to main content
. 2006 Aug 10;577(Pt 1):55–68. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.111765

Table 1.

C-fos expression in VMS and adjacent areas

Classic CSF Low Ca2+−high Mg2+ CSF Middle VMS lesion



Oxygenated n = 8 Anoxic n = 9 Oxygenated n = 6 Anoxic n = 8 Oxygenated n = 6 Anoxic n = 6
a b a, c d, e a, f, g
Raphe pallidus nucleus 7.4 ± 2.0  5.5 ± 0.8  6.8 ± 0.4  6.9 ± 0.5 8.2 ± 1.3  8.8 ± 0.6
n.s. n.s. n.s., n.s. n.s., n.s. n.s., n.s., n.s.
Medial VMS 3.1 ± 0.3  6.8 ± 0.3  2.7 ± 0.2  2.9 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0.5  2.5 ± 0.2
P < 0.0001 n.s. n.s., P < 0.0001 n.s., n.s. n.s., P < 0.0001, n.s.
Perifacial RTN/pFRG VMS 15.3 ± 0.6 29.1 ± 2.0 15.8 ± 0.3 26.3 ± 2.6
P < 0.03 n.s. P < 0.004, n.s.
Middle VMS 8.5 ± 0.8 19.4 ± 2.8  9.8 ± 0.4 15.8 ± 2.8
P < 0.005 n.s. P < 0.05, n.s.
Lateral VMS 6.8 ± 0.4  9.7 ± 1.1  6.0 ± 0.3 10.5 ± 0.7 5.9 ± 0.9 11.2 ± 0.6
P < 0.05 n.s. P < 0.0003, n.s. n.s., n.s. P < 0.0001, n.s., n.s.
Facial nucleus 71.6 ± 3.5 69.5 ± 5.1 68.1 ± 8.2 68.3 ± 3.7 62.0 ± 5.7  62.2 ± 0.6
n.s. n.s. n.s., n.s. n.s., n.s. n.s., n.s., n.s.

Values are mean number (±s.e.m.) of FLI neurons/section. a, indicates comparison between oxygenated and anoxic conditions for classic, low Ca2+−high Mg2+ CSF and middle VMS lesion; b, indicates comparison between classic and low Ca2+−high Mg2+ CSF oxygenated conditions; c, indicates comparison between classic and low Ca2+−high Mg2+ CSF anoxic conditions; d, indicates comparison between classic-CSF and middle VMS lesion in oxygenated conditions; e, indicates comparison between low Ca2+−high Mg2+ CSF and middle VMS lesion in oxygenated conditions; f, indicates comparison between classic CSF and middle VMS lesion in anoxic conditions; g, indicates comparison between low Ca2+−high Mg2+ CSF and middle VMS lesion in anoxic conditions. n.s., not significant.