Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct;93(10):1263–1267. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.097816

Table 3 Prevalence of IHD according to ANA, ACA and RF positivity, together with unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for IHD.

Antibody status Men (n = 567) Women (n = 589)
n No (%) with IHD OR for IHD (95%CI) n No (%) with IHD OR for IHD (95%CI)
ACA*
 –ve 430 51 (11.9) 473 41 (8.7)
 +ve 137 15 (10.9) 0.9 (0.5 to1.7), p = 0.77 116 13 (11.2) 1.3 (0.7 to 2.6), p = 0.40
1.1 (0.6 to 2.0), p = 0.81† 1.3 (0.7 to 2.6), p = 0.41†
ANA
 –ve 506 62 (12.3) 517 50 (9.7)
 +ve 61 4 (6.6) 0.5 (0.2 to1.4), p = 0.20 72 4 (5.6) 0.6 (0.2 to1.6), p = 0.26
0.5 (0.2 to1.6), p = 0.25† 0.6 (0.2 to1.6), p = 0.28†
RF
 –ve 475 44 (9.3) 516 46 (8.9)
 +ve 92 22 (23.9) 3.1 (1.7 to 5.4), p<0.001 73 8 (11.0) 1.3 (0.6 to 2.8), p = 0.57
2.9 (1.6 to 5.3), p<0.001† 1.2 (0.5 to 2.8), p = 0.61†

ACA, anticardiolipin antibodies; ANA, antinuclear antibodies; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; OR, odds ratio; RF, rheumatoid factor.

*ACA positivity defined as the top octile from the IgG or IgM ELISA.

†Odds ratio adjusted for BMI, smoking status, family history of IHD, diabetes, high blood pressure and HDL:LDL ratio.