Skip to main content
. 2007 May 2;91(10):1337–1340. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.116905

Table 3 Comparison with other studies.

Govindan et al3 Robaei et al5 Yu et al7 This study
Greenberg et al4
Study design Population, USA Population, Australia Clinic, Hong Kong Clinic, Singapore
Study population Children ⩽19 yrs (n = 509 with strabismus) Children aged 7 yrs (n = 1739, 48 with strabismus) All ages (n = 2704) XT: all ages Children ⩽16 yrs (n = 682) Children ⩽7 yrs (n = 494)
ET: children ⩽19 yrs
Exotropia (XT)
Intermittent 71%* 93% 69% 92% 93%
Constant na 7% 32% 4% 3%
Secondary 23%† na na 4% 4%
Esotropia (ET)
Infantile 8.1% na 2%‡ 23% 25%
46.5% 34% 48%‡ 53% 53%
Accommodative −36.4% −20% 29%
 Fully –10.1% 25%‡ –33% 24%
 Partially 16.6% na
 Acquired 17.9%† na na 17% 16%
 Secondary 6% 5%
XT: ET ratio 35:65 35:65§ 71:29§ 72:28 67:33

*Intermittent X(T) includes subjects with convergence insufficiency. †Includes combination of central nervous system and sensory disorders. ‡Estimated from graph (1999–2001). A further 20% had microesotropia. §After removal of microstrabismus, vertical and incomitant strabismus.