TABLE 3.
Leave-one-out cross validationa
Array | Array ID | Class labelb | No. of genes in classifier | Validation by:
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linear discriminant analysis | Nearest-neighbor prediction | 3-Nearest-neighbors prediction | Nearest-centroid Analysis | ||||
1 | CON r1 | CON | 185 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
2 | CON r2 | CON | 152 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
3 | CON r3 | CON | 185 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
4 | LPS r1 | LPS | 209 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
5 | LPS r2 | LPS | 194 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
6 | LPS r3 | LPS | 154 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
7 | SAC r1 | SAC | 295 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
8 | SAC r2 | SAC | 170 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
9 | SAC r3 | SAC | 182 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Leave-one-out cross validation demonstrated the ability of probe sets significant at the P < 0.001 level to function as classifiers of treatment response. In every case, the class identity of the array left out of the training set was correctly predicted by each of the four prediction models. See also Fig. 3.
CON, control unstimulated leukocytes; SAC, leukocytes exposed to S. aureus Cowan for 2 h prior to RNA harvest.