Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct;69(10):6327–6333. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6327-6333.2003

TABLE 4.

Effect of reduced stx2 (FAM) probe concentration on background end fluorescence (dR) in the FAM and TET channelsa

Isolate Result in channel with indicated stx2 probe concn (μM)
stx2 (FAM)
uidA SNP (TET)
Genotype 0.1
0.025
Genotype 0.1
0.025
Ct dR Ct dR Ct dR Ct dR
13A71 Pos. 19.33 315.7 19.99 104.456 Neg. 33.897 28.3
13A74 Pos. 19.93 389.5 20.36 111.5 Neg. 24.79b 44.9 24.042
13A75 Pos. 19.72 409 19.68 106.828 Neg. 31 18
13A76 Pos. 19.7 404.422 20.09 103.389 Neg. 35.238 22.571
13B47 Pos. 21.43 275.952 20.85 96.564 Pos. 22.91 82.714 22.31 77.714
CDC 3493-88 Pos. 20.24 268.344 19.86 102 Neg. 42 12.993
13C06 Pos. 19.61 306.429 19.69 106.65 Neg. 34.571 33.9
13C10 Pos. 19.34 414.762 19.83 116.75 Neg. 35.022 23.25
CFSAN$406 Pos. 16.81 366 17.63 104 Neg. 21.76b 51.3 27
CFSAN$407 Pos. 21.08 277.571 21.12 105.5 Neg. 34.182 26.3
3377-85 Pos. 19.14 344.25 19.18 114.381 Neg. 14.1 24.1
3493-88 Pos. 19.93 302.25 20.32 94.714 Neg. 23.75 7.560
3024-94 Pos. 19.76 445.133 19.93 119.286 Neg. 26 12.052
EDL 933 Pos. 18.54 413 18.92 102.5 Pos. 22.91 68.091 23.24 70.286
a

Pos., positive; − and Neg., negative.

b

False-positive result due to spectral overlap from the stx2 (FAM) probe at 0.1 μM.