Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct;69(10):5974–5982. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.5974-5982.2003

TABLE 3.

Results of MRPP testing for significant differences between predefined groups determined on the basis of nosZ T-RFLP profiles (CfoI, MspI, and RsaI results have been combined)

Test and sites A statistica
Difference in proportional abundance Difference in presence vs absence
Comparison by vegetation type
    Carpenter meadow vs Carpenter forest 0.29 (P < 10−5) 0.23 (P < 10−5)
    Lookout meadow vs Lookout forest 0.26 (P < 10−5) 0.34 (P < 10−5)
Comparison by site
    Carpenter meadow vs Lookout meadow 0.18 (P < 0.001) 0.17 (P < 0.001)
    Carpenter forest vs Lookout forest 0.24 (P < 10−5) 0.05 (P = 0.02)
Comparison of randomized datab
    Carpenter meadow vs Carpenter forest −0.04 (P = 1.0) −0.01 (P = 0.7)
a

The A statistic measures within-group relatedness compared to that expected by chance; A statistic values of about 0.3 reflect strong differences between groups (23).

b

T-RFLP profiles from the Carpenter site were randomized among sample units.