Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep;177(1):329–345. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.076513

TABLE 1.

Free-running locomotion, in DD or LL, at different temperatures

Photic condition 18°
25°
29°
Genotype N N rhy (%) Mean hr ± SEM N N rhy (%) Mean hr ± SEM N N rhy (%) Mean hr ± SEM
DD s-tim cry01 or 02 82 51 (62) 23.7 ± 0.1 51 50 (98) 23.7 ± 0.1 (82% of rhy) or 22.9 ± 0.1 (18% of rhy) 55 52 (95) 23.4 ± 0.1
DD s-tim cry+ 16 15 (94) 23.9 ± 0.1 14 14 (100) 23.9 ± 0.0 29 29 (100) 23.4 ± 0.1
LL s-tim cry01 or 02 89 55 (62) 24.2 ± 0.1 74 70 (95) 21.4 ± 0.0 and 25.4 ± 0.1 85 48 (57) 20.1 ± 0.1 and 23.8 ± 0.2
LL ls-tim cry01 or 02 ND 67 57 (85) 21.7 ± 0.0 and 25.4 ± 0.1 ND
LL Df/cry01, 02, or 03 ND 63 58 (92) 23.6 ± 0.1 (38% of rhy) 21.9 ± 0.2 and 25.0 ± 0.1 (62% of rhy) ND

Flies were entrained under 12:12 hr light-dark cycling conditions for 5–6 days then released into constant conditions for 7 days of locomotor monitoring. s-tim and ls-tim, naturally occurring tim iso-alleles (Rosato et al. 1997; Peschel et al. 2006); Df, deletion of the cry locus and of neighboring third-chromosomal genes; N, numbers of tested flies or number rhythmic (rhy); Mean, average period determined by periodogram and verified by the straight-edge/slope procedure (see materials and methods); SEM, standard error of the mean; ND, not done (meaning that the LL monitorings of flies with genotypes in the bottom two rows were tested only at 25°). No differential effects on these characters were discernible with regard to cry0 derived from the separately numbered such strains (second column from the left).