TABLE 3.
Number of genes within each of the 28 patterns of expression
| No. of genes differentially expressed
|
||
|---|---|---|
| Pattern | By ≥1.5-fold | By ≥2-fold |
| E | 436 | 315 |
| M | 177 | 95 |
| L | 937 | 657 |
| EM | 1799 | 1328 |
| EL | 1033 | 633 |
| ML | 841 | 634 |
| Coch | 59 | 34 |
| V | 824 | 225 |
| Yng-M | 195 | 75 |
| Old-M | 218 | 82 |
| E10.5-Up | 71 | 33 |
| E10.5-Down | 202 | 80 |
| E11-UP | 57 | 17 |
| E11-Down | 182 | 91 |
| Both-M | — | 420 |
| C | 106 | 60 |
| U | 188 | 115 |
| S | 241 | 109 |
| CS | 43 | 31 |
| CU | 215 | 65 |
| US | 211 | 97 |
| Yng-L | 142 | 34 |
| Old-L | 188 | 84 |
| E14-Up | 171 | 43 |
| E14-Down | 499 | 151 |
| Both-L | — | 720 |
| IE-Up | — | 1410a |
| — | — | 384b |
| IE-Down | — | 226a |
| — | — | 66b |
The number of genes that change by ≥1.5-fold or ≥2-fold (with an estimated FDR of at most 0.5%) are shown for each type of pattern according to the abbreviations in Table 2. In EML analysis, the lowest boundary of fold changes was 1.5-fold after taking error into account. In M and L analyses, the number of genes indicated are those that were able to meet the two-way ANOVA P-value cutoff of 0.005 (see text and supplemental Materials and Methods for details). These had a lowest boundary of fold changes of 1.4-fold after taking error into account. Genes within expression patterns Both-M and Both-L do not have an expression ratio associated with them.
Genes that were either up- or downregulated in at least one-tenth of all IE samples relative to at least one NIE sample.
Genes that were either up- or downregulated in at least one-third of all IE samples relative to at least one NIE sample.