Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 18;150(3):335–341. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706996

Table 2.

Effects of saline, atenolol and ivabradine on myocardial wall thickening at rest and during exercise

  Baseline Rest Paced rest Exercise Exercise paced
EDWT (mm)
 Saline 8.9±0.5 8.8±0.5 9.0±0.6 8.7±0.5 9.0±0.6
 Atenolol 8.9±0.6 8.6±0.5 8.7±0.5 8.3±0.5* 9.3±0.6
 Ivabradine 8.8±0.5 8.7±0.6 8.9±0.6 8.5±0.5 9.2±0.6
           
SWT (mm)
 Saline 2.6±0.2 2.6±0.2 2.5±0.2 3.7±0.5 3.4±0.6
 Atenolol 2.6±0.1 2.4±0.3 2.2±0.2 3.4±0.4 2.3±0.2
 Ivabradine 2.6±0.2 2.6±0.2 2.3±0.2 4.4±0.5* 3.5±0.6
           
PSWT (mm)
 Saline 0.25±0.02 0.21±0.03 0.21±0.04 0.15±0.04 0.16±0.05
 Atenolol 0.23±0.04 0.35±0.07* 0.38±0.07* 0.30±0.04* 0.37±0.07*
 Ivabradine 0.24±0.06 0.22±0.07 0.22±0.03 0.11±0.04 0.17±0.05

Abbreviations: EDWT, end-diastolic wall thickness; PSWT, postsystolic wall thickening; SWT, systolic wall thickening.

Values are mean±s.e.m., n=6 dogs in all sequences. Doses for atenolol and ivabradine were 1 mg kg−1.

*

P<0.05 vs saline.