Table 2.
Effects of saline, atenolol and ivabradine on myocardial wall thickening at rest and during exercise
Baseline | Rest | Paced rest | Exercise | Exercise paced | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDWT (mm) | |||||
Saline | 8.9±0.5 | 8.8±0.5 | 9.0±0.6 | 8.7±0.5 | 9.0±0.6 |
Atenolol | 8.9±0.6 | 8.6±0.5 | 8.7±0.5 | 8.3±0.5* | 9.3±0.6 |
Ivabradine | 8.8±0.5 | 8.7±0.6 | 8.9±0.6 | 8.5±0.5 | 9.2±0.6 |
SWT (mm) | |||||
Saline | 2.6±0.2 | 2.6±0.2 | 2.5±0.2 | 3.7±0.5 | 3.4±0.6 |
Atenolol | 2.6±0.1 | 2.4±0.3 | 2.2±0.2 | 3.4±0.4 | 2.3±0.2 |
Ivabradine | 2.6±0.2 | 2.6±0.2 | 2.3±0.2 | 4.4±0.5* | 3.5±0.6 |
PSWT (mm) | |||||
Saline | 0.25±0.02 | 0.21±0.03 | 0.21±0.04 | 0.15±0.04 | 0.16±0.05 |
Atenolol | 0.23±0.04 | 0.35±0.07* | 0.38±0.07* | 0.30±0.04* | 0.37±0.07* |
Ivabradine | 0.24±0.06 | 0.22±0.07 | 0.22±0.03 | 0.11±0.04 | 0.17±0.05 |
Abbreviations: EDWT, end-diastolic wall thickness; PSWT, postsystolic wall thickening; SWT, systolic wall thickening.
Values are mean±s.e.m., n=6 dogs in all sequences. Doses for atenolol and ivabradine were 1 mg kg−1.
P<0.05 vs saline.