Skip to main content
. 2007 Mar 20;151(2):292–302. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707210

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Contralateral delivery of WIN 55,212–2. Paw withdrawal responses (PWR) to mechanical and cooling stimuli at 2, 4 and 6 days after PNL injury measured from the injured hind limb during perineural mini-osmotic pump delivery of WIN 55,212–2 (1.4 and 2.8 μg μl−1 h−1) or vehicle solution to the uninjured side (n=3 per group). (a) Mean paw withdrawal response force for mechanical stimulation in each treatment group. P>0.05 contralateral WIN 55,212–2 (1.4 μg μl−1h−1)-treated rats versus contralateral vehicle-treated rats; Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, Dunn's test. Contralateral WIN 55,212–2 (2.8 μg μl−1 h−1)-treated rats versus contralateral vehicle-treated rats, ANOVA, Tukey test. (b) Mean percentage paw withdrawal response to cooling stimulation in each treatment group. P>0.05 contralateral WIN 55,212–2 (1.4 μg μl−1 h−1)-treated rats versus contralateral vehicle-treated rats; ANOVA, Student–Newman–Keuls. P>0.05 contralateral WIN 55,212–2 (2.8 μg μl−1 h−1)-treated rats versus contralateral vehicle-treated rats; ANOVA, Student–Newman–Keuls.