Skip to main content
. 2000 Aug;50(2):99–107. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00245.x

Table 3.

Effect of saquinavir and ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of the sildenafil metabolite UK‐103,320.

Pharmacokinetic parameter
Treatment regimen AUC (ng ml−1 h) Cmax (ng ml−1) tmax (h) λz (h−1)
Study I (n = 27)
Saquinavir
Sildenafil (day 1) 569 116 2.5 0.121
Sildenafil (day 7/8)/saquinavir (day 2–8) 1172 94 6.4 0.144
Placebo
Sildenafil (day 1) 659 118 3.5 0.111
Sildenafil (day 7/8)/placebo (day 2–8) 582 95 3.5 0.148
*P value < 0.0001 0.995 0.002 0.352
Study II(n = 28)
Ritonavir
Sildenafil (day 1) 567a 132 2.0 0.141
Sildenafil (day 7/8)/ritonavir (day 2–8) 840a 55 11.7 na
Placebo
Sildenafil (day 1) 731a 160 2.5 0.121
Sildenafil (day 7/8)/placebo (day 2–8) 622a 129 2.5 0.124
*P value < 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001

Sildenafil administered as a single 100 mg dose; saquinavir administered at a dosage of 1200 mg three times daily; ritonavir administered at a dosage of 300, 400 and 500 mg twice daily on days 2, 3 and 4–8, respectively.

a

AUC value from time zero to the final quantifiable concentration (AUCt).

*

intergroup comparison (saquinavir/ritonavir vs placebo) of change in UK‐103 320 pharmacokinetics from day 1 to day 7/8

geometric mean

arithmetic mean.