Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan;51(1):35–43. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01320.x

Table 2.

Population pharmacodynamic parameter estimates from the parallel (MOX-NA, MOX-SBP and MOX-HR; full and reduced data set) and sequential (MOX-NA-SBP and MOX-NA-HR) pharmacodynamic analysis. Values are given as the mean population estimate (± %RSE).

MOX-NA MOX-SBP NA-SBP MOX-HR NA-HR
Data set full full reduced reduced full reduced reduced
Pharmacodynamic submodel
 Baseline 395 126 125 126 78 77 77
 (ng l−1 – mmHg – beats min−1) (4) (2) (2) (2) (1) (1) (1)
 Slope (= Emax/EC50) 26 16 27.5 0.24 9.3 4.7 0.18
 (%decrease/ng ml−1) (27) (25) (20) (32) (20) (43) (43)
 Emax 47 20 19 12 25 16 5.2
 (%) (25) (21) (16) (30) (46) (84) (22)
 ke0 1.1 0.60 0.41 0.49 0.32
 (h−1) (65) (46) (22) (21) (47)
Covariate submodel
 Baseline increase with time 2.3
 (%/week) (17)
 Delay in disease progression with drug 9.8
 (weeks) (14)
 Decrease in drug effect 4.5 5.1 5.9 6.4 5.7 6.6
 (Slope) (%/week) (27) (17) (29) (16) (29) (5)
 Diurnal baseline change – peak time 22:00 22:00 23:00
 (hh:mm) (4) (4) (3)
 Diurnal baseline change – magnitude 4.3 5.3 6.3
 100* (peak-average)/average (20) (15) (18)
Statistical submodel
 Inter-individual variability in Baseline 37 15 15 15 13 13 13
 (%) (7) (7) (7) (7) (8) (9) (9)
 Inter-individual variability in Slope 110 220 147 212 120 182 444
 (%) (34) (31) (28) (31) (22) (43) (36)
 Inter-individual variability in ke0 160 140 122
 (%) (37) 30) (25)
 Interoccasion variability in Baseline 18 6.0 6.0 5.7 5.5 6.0 6.0
 (%) (7) (6) (8) (8) (7) (9) (8)
 Residual variability 20 8.0 7.9 8.3 5.3 5.2 5.2
(%CV – s.d.(mmHg) – s.d.(beats min−1)) (5) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3)