Table 3.
Advantages and disadvantages of pharmacokinetic methods and gamma scintigraphy.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Pharmacokinetics methods | |
| Good for comparison of | Need to differentiate |
| relative lung deposition | between the swallowed |
| relative systemic delivery | and inhaled doses |
| Identifies the effective lung | Does not identify dose deposition into different zones of the lungs |
| Original product used | Some assays do not have the sensitivity to measure the low concentrations |
| Simple crossover design for studies. | |
| No washout period (can substitute another drug for continued management) | |
| Can use urine samples | |
| Shows a dose response relationship | |
| Gamma scintigraphy | |
| Widely used – good for comparisons | Reformulation of the product |
| Identifies the total lung dose | Long-term safety of radionuclide |
| Differentiates between deposition | In vitro validation of |
| into different zones of the lungs | reformulated product required and methods are not standardized |
| Striking visual images | Correction for tissue attenuation |
| Simple crossover design | Tissue attenuation |
| No wash-out period required | Does not identify systemic delivery |
| Demonstrates dose-response | Does not identify the |
| relationships | effective lung dose |
| Expensive study to commission | |