Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul;52(1):9–16. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01412.x

Table 3.

Opinions about CME

Statement Strongly agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly disagree
The BPS Clinical Section should take responsibility for addressing my needs for specialist CME 9 (7%) 52 (42%) 39 (32%) 18 (15%) 4 (3%)
Individual academic departments should contribute to the development and updating of learning materials 9 (7%) 83 (68%) 21 (17%) 8 (7%) 2 (2%)
Assessment of CME should always involve some valid measure of learning outcome 11 (9%) 55 (45%) 35 (29%) 18 (15%) 3 (3%)
Credit for attendance at national/international conferences should require evidence that new knowledge has been disseminated to colleagues 6 (5%) 41 (34%) 23 (19%) 46 (38%) 5 (4%)
The needs of clinical pharmacologists for CME are so diverse that no discrete core of knowledge can be identified that would be generally useful 9 (7%) 34 (28%) 27 (22%) 51 (42%) 1 (1%)