Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul;52(1):69–76. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01417.x

Table 2.

Effect of reducing the dose of propranolol and/or inserting a delay between propranolol and rizatriptan administration on pharmacokinetic parameters for rizatriptan in 12 healthy subjects

Rizatriptan pharmacokinetic parameters (arithmetic means±s.d.) (n = 12)
Parameter 10 mg rizatriptan+ placebo propranolol 10 mg Rizatriptan+ 60 mg propranolol 10 mg rizatriptan 1 h after 60 mg propranolol 10 mg rizatriptan 1 h after 120 mg propranolol 10 mg rizatriptan 2 h after 120 mg propranolol
AUC(0,∞) (ng ml−1 h) 61.8 ± 12.1 80.9 ± 16.6 84.7 ± 27.8 89.3 ± 21.9 86.3 ± 22.9
Geometric mean AUC ratio 1.38* 1.42* 1.53* 1.45*
vs rizatriptan alone (1.24, 1.54) (1.27, 1.58) (1.37, 1.71) (1.30, 1.61)
(97.5% confidence interval)
Cmax (ng ml−1) 19.5 ± 4.8 25.0 ± 4.8 27.1 ± 9.9 24.8 ± 7.9 27.2 ± 10.1
Geometric mean Cmax ratio vs 1.39* 1.48* 1.29* 1.45*
rizatriptan alone (1.21, 1.60) (1.29, 1.70) (1.12, 1.49) (1.26, 1.67)
(90% confidence interval)
tmax (h) 0.9 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.7
Kela 0.379 0.361 0.379 0.363 0.337
(0.335, 0.423) (0.317, 0.405) (0.335, 0.423) (0.319, 0.407) (0.293, 0.381)
t½ (h)b 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.9
Ue (%) 9.7 ± 3.0 11.5 ± 3.2 11.0 ± 4.0 14.8 ± 4.8 10.6 ± 3.3
CLR (ml min−1) 261.5 ± 64.6 242.8 ± 72.8 227.4 ± 85.9 294.3 ± 119.4 229.9 ± 134.8
*

P < 0.01 vs 10 mg rizatriptan+propranolol placebo.

a

Arithmetic mean (95% confidence interval).

b

Harmonic mean.

AUC(0,∞)=area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity; Cmax=maximal plasma concentration; tmax=time to achieve maximal plasma concentration; Kel=elimination rate constant; CLR=renal clearance.