Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 6;149(8):1092–1103. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706945

Table 5.

TCM prescription and non-TCM recipe classification accuracies of the artificial intelligence classification systems, kNN and SVM, evaluated by threefold cross-validation study

Cross validation Training set Testing set
  TCM prescriptions Non-TCM recipes TP FN P+ % TN FP P− % P%
AI classification system: kNN
 1 388 7453 341 47 87.9 3706 43 98.8 97.8
 2 384 7468 314 70 81.8 3699 35 99.1 97.4
 3 389 7483 325 64 83.6 3670 49 98.7 97.3
Average Accuracy         84.4     98.9 97.5
                   
AI classification system: SVM
 1 388 7453 360 28 92.8 3692 57 98.4 97.9
 2 384 7468 342 42 89.1 3684 50 98.6 97.7
 3 389 7483 358 31 92.0 3670 49 98.7 98.1
Average accuracy         91.3     98.6 97.9

P+, P− and P represent the classification accuracy for TCM prescriptions, non-TCM recipes and all recipes, respectively. TP, TN, FP and FN are the number of true positive (correctly classified TCM prescriptions), true negative (correctly classified non-TCM recipes), false positive (TCM prescriptions falsely classified as non-TCM recipes) and false negative (non-TCM recipes falsely classified as TCM prescriptions), respectively, and N is the total number of recipes.

Bold numerals are used to highlight the average accuracies of the two AI systems.