Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun;85(6):1465–1477. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.6.1465

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics in the 2 intervention groups of all randomly assigned subjects and for subjects who completed the trial1

All randomly assigned subjects Study completers


Characteristic RF group
(n = 49)
RF + FV group
(n = 48)
RF group
(n = 36)
RF + FV group
(n = 35)
Age (y) 44.5 ± 1.32 45.3 ± 1.4 45.1 ± 1.5 46.7 ± 1.5
Ethnicity [n (%)]
 White 44 (90) 47 (97) 33 (92) 34 (97)
 Other 5 (10) 1 (3) 3 (8) 1 (3)
Educational level [n (%)]
 High school diploma or less 14 (28) 12 (25) 10 (28) 9 (26)
 Some college to associate degree 18 (37) 15 (31) 11 (30) 10 (28)
 Bachelor’s to graduate degree 17 (35) 21 (44) 15 (42) 16 (46)
Hunger score3 6.0 ± 0.4 6.1 ± 0.5 6.0 ± 0.5 6.1 ± 0.6
Disinhibition score3 9.6 ± 0.5 10.0 ± 0.5 9.7 ± 0.6 10.2 ± 0.6
Dietary restraint score3 9.4 ± 0.6 8.9 ± 0.5 9.5 ± 0.7 9.0 ± 0.6
Depression score4 7.5 ± 0.9 6.8 ± 0.8 7.0 ± 1.0 6.9 ± 1.0
Binge-eating score5 12.6 ± 0.9 13.3 ± 0.9 11.8 ± 1.0 13.1 ± 0.9
1

RF, reduced-fat intervention; RF + FV, reduced-fat plus increased fruit and vegetable intervention. Baseline values did not differ significantly between groups (unpaired t test), either for all randomly assigned subjects or for subjects who completed the trial.

2

¯x ± SEM (all such values).

3

Eating Inventory (40).

4

Beck Depression Inventory (18).

5

Eating Habits Checklist (21).