Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 30;4:62. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-62

Table 1.

Distribution of CTL Responses (breadth and strength) between HIV proteins

Protein No. of Peptides No. of OLP targeted at least once in the cohort (%) No. of subjects with responses (%) CTL strength (Mean ± SD) (SFC/106 PBMC)

B C B C B C B C
Gag-p17* 17 17 14(82.4%) 16(94.1%) 32(53.3%) 43(71.7%) 610 ± 1185 964 ± 1340
Gag-p24 31 31 30(96.8%) 30(96.8%) 51(85.0%) 52(86.7%) 3155 ± 3894 2935 ± 3390
Gag-p15 19 19 12(63.2%) 13(68.4%) 32(53.3%) 34(56.7%) 767 ± 1495 698 ± 1290

Gag 67 67 56(83.6%) 59(88.1%) 55(91.7%) 54(90.0%) 4532 ± 5512 4597 ± 5073
Pol – Pro*# 21 21 12(57.1%) 6(28.6%) 22(36.7%) 11(18.3%) 437 ± 949 240 ± 729
Pol – RT* 59 59 40(67.8%) 47(79.7%) 46(76.7%) 53(88.3%) 1047 ± 1461 2104 ± 2691
Pol – Rnase* 17 17 9(52.9%) 12(70.6%) 14(23.3%) 33(55.0%) 250 ± 1066 562 ± 1258
Pol – Int 36 36 27(75.0%) 30(83.3%) 38(63.3%) 42(70.0%) 864 ± 1158 922 ± 1228

Pol* 133 133 88(66.2%) 95(71.4%) 52(86.7%) 58(96.7%) 2598 ± 3069 3828 ± 4090
Env-gp120* 68 68 28(41.2%) 39(57.4%) 32(53.3%) 38(63.3%) 690 ± 1445 1034 ± 2062
Env-gp41* 46 46 17(37.0%) 31(67.4%) 29(48.3%) 45(75.0%) 649 ± 1377 943 ± 1389

Env* 114 114 45(39.5%) 70(61.4%) 46(76.7%) 52(86.7%) 1339 ± 2040 1976 ± 2624
Nef 27 27 26(96.3%) 24(88.9%) 52(86.7%) 51(85.0%) 2727 ± 4305 2812 ± 4217
Rev 15 14 10(66.7%) 9(64.3%) 18(30.0%) 28(46.7%) 552 ± 1421 590 ± 1105
Tat 13 13 7(53.8%) 6(46.2%) 10(16.7%) 9(15.0%) 283 ± 1103 132 ± 496
Vpu*# 9 9 8(88.9%) 3(33.3%) 9(15.0%) 3(5.0%) 144 ± 535 24 ± 115
Vpr 11 11 10(90.9%) 11(100%) 27(45.0%) 27(45.0%) 532 ± 1070 522 ± 988
Vif 24 24 13(54.2%) 19(79.2%) 20(33.3%) 37(61.7%) 576 ± 1627 762 ± 1483

Total * 413 412 263(63.7%) 296(71.8%) 60(100%) 60(100%) 13283 ± 14223 15242 ± 14353

1. * denotes a significant difference in responses targeting clade B and C OLPs (p value < 0.05, paired t test).

2. # denotes that the CTL responses to clade B OLPs targeting protease and Vpu are significantly stronger and broader than to clade C OLPs