Table 2.
Receptor | h/rCRF EC50, nM | oCRF EC50, nM | Sauvagine EC50, nM |
---|---|---|---|
hCRF-R1a | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1†¶ |
h1(1–123)x1(124–415) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1‡∥ |
h1(1–92)x1(93–415) | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
h1(1–67)x1(68–415) | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 4.1 ± 0.3* | 20.9 ± 0.5*§ |
x1(1–67)h1(68–415) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
x1(1–92)h1(93–415) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.7* | 20.9 ± 0.6*§ |
x1(1–123)h1(124–415) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 0.9* | 26.1 ± 0.7*§ |
xCRF-R1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 7.1 ± 0.8* | 39.7 ± 0.8*§ |
Data are the mean ± SEM of three stimulations. Statistically significant differences:
P < 0.0001 vs. h/rCRF.
P < 0.01 vs. h/rCRF
P < 0.05 vs. h/rCRF.
P < 0.0001 vs. oCRF.
P < 0.001 vs. oCRF.
∥ P < 0.01 vs. oCRF.
From ref. 28.