Skip to main content
. 1998 Apr 28;95(9):4941–4946. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.4941

Table 2.

Stimulation of cAMP accumulation by different CRF-like peptides in HEK 293 cells expressing hCRF-R1, xCRF-R1, or six different chimeric receptor cDNAs

Receptor h/rCRF EC50, nM oCRF EC50, nM Sauvagine EC50, nM
hCRF-R1a 1.6 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.1
h1(1–123)x1(124–415) 0.8 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1
h1(1–92)x1(93–415) 0.9 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.2
h1(1–67)x1(68–415) 0.7 ± 0.2 4.1 ± 0.3* 20.9 ± 0.5*§
x1(1–67)h1(68–415) 0.8 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.2
x1(1–92)h1(93–415) 0.7 ± 0.1 4.9 ± 0.7* 20.9 ± 0.6*§
x1(1–123)h1(124–415) 0.8 ± 0.2 6.5 ± 0.9* 26.1 ± 0.7*§
xCRF-R1 1.1 ± 0.1 7.1 ± 0.8* 39.7 ± 0.8*§

Data are the mean ± SEM of three stimulations. Statistically significant differences: 

*

P < 0.0001 vs. h/rCRF. 

P < 0.01 vs. h/rCRF 

P < 0.05 vs. h/rCRF. 

§

P < 0.0001 vs. oCRF. 

P < 0.001 vs. oCRF. 

P < 0.01 vs. oCRF. 

a

 From ref. 28