Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Dec;102(12):1779–1784. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90381-0

Table 1.

Relation between anthropometric parameters, as measured by subjects themselves and as measured by a skilled technician (N=152).

Anthropometric measurements N Measurements by
Pb Correlation coefficientc
Subject Mean ± Sd Technician Mean ± Sd
Weight (kg) 150 61.9 ± 10.4 61.7 ± 10.4 NS 0.94
Height (cm) 150 161.4 ± 6.4 161.0 ± 6.1 NS 0.89
Sitting Height (cm) 128 84.2 ± 11.5 85.3 ± 3.6 <.01 0.56
Hip Circumference (cm) 151 97.7 ± 9.8 98.7 ± 8.2 <.01 0.90
Waist Circumference (cm) 150 77.7 ± 10.6 77.1 ± 10.3 NS 0.79
Bust Circumference (base) (cm) 149 81.0 ± 7.2 81.5 ± 7.6 NS 0.83
Bust Circumference (nipples) (cm) 149 94.0 ± 8.2 93.4 ± 8.4 <.05 0.94
BMId 149 23.81 ± 3.8 23.79 ± 3.8 NS 0.92
Silhouette 151 3.65 ± 1.1 3.46 ± 1.1 <.05 0.85
a

SD= standard deviation

b

p value: Student’s t-test for paired samples: H0: means are equal.

c

Pearson correlation coefficient: H0: the correlation coefficients are equal to zero. All correlations were significantly different from zero (p-value < 0.0001).

d

BMI defined as weight (kg)/height (m2).