Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Dec;102(12):1779–1784. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90381-0

Table 2.

Repartition of the misclassification of the observed silhouette, according to the “Expected” silhouette, for the women of the E3N cohort (n=91,815).

“Expected” body silhouette N Lower
Realistic
Higher
N % N % N %
1 632 24 3.8 608 96.2 0 0.0
1.5b 1,259 98 7.8 1,161 96.2 0 0.0
2 6,991 67 1.0 6,867 98.2 57 0.8
2.5 8,405 182 2.2 7,899 94.0 324 3.8
3 34,509 532 1.5 33,677 97.6 300 0.9
3.5 9,733 432 4.4 9,014 92.6 287 3.0
4 15,024 210 1.4 14,545 96.8 269 1.8
4.5 1,049 17 1.6 890 84.8 142 13.6
5 5,925 18 0.3 5,255 88.7 652 11.0
5.5 3,233 27 0.8 2,033 62.9 1,173 36.3
6 4,419 11 0.3 3,518 79.6 890 20.1
<6 636 0 0.0 0 0.0 636 100
Total 91,815 1,618 1.8 85,467 93.1 4,730 5.1
a

Expected body silhouette was found fitting the distribution of the silhouette estimated by technicians, on the validation sample, to the whole cohort sorted by increasing BMI.

b

intermediate silhouettes in case of two adjacent choices.