Table 1. Review of left lateral/extended right split liver series.
Lead author | Year | Total no. | Graft survival (%) | Patient survival (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Edmond 20 | 1990 | 18 | 52 | 67 |
Shaw 21 | 1990 | 10 | 50 | 50 |
Broelsch 22 | 1990 | 30 | – | 60 |
Langnas 23 | 1992 | 10 | – | 50 |
Houssin 24 | 1993 | 16 | 69 | 75 |
Sloof 25 | 1995 | 15 | 67 | 73 |
Otte 26 | 1995 | 29 | 67 | 71 |
De Ville de Goyet 27 (European analysis) | 1995 | 98 | – | 68 |
Azoulay 28 | 1996 | 27 | 78.4 | 79.5 |
Rogiers 29(exlin situ) | 1996 | 19/14 | 58/86 | 63/93 |
Kalayoglu 30 | 1996 | 12 | 75 | 91.6 |
Goss 31(in situ) | 1997 | 28 | 86 | 92 |
Rela[l8] | 1998 | 41 | 88 | 90 |
Mirza 13 | 1998 | 24 | 68 | 78 |
Chardot 32 (incl. two segments II–IV) | 1999 | 16 | 62 | 66.7 |
Sindhi 33 (UNOS analysis) | 1999 | 89 | 60.3 | 82 |
Ghobrial 3(in situ; right/left) | 2000 | 110 | – | 80/76 |
Spada 15 (right/left) | 2000 | 42/42 | 79/ | 84/85 |
Reyes 14(exlin situ) | 2000 | 25/29 | 61/81 | 74/96 |
Hamburg (unpublished data) | 2002 | 171 | 78.4 | 85.6 |