Table 1.
Reference | Etiology | Damage | Amnesia | RA > AA | Gradient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brown and Chobor (37) | CHI | Bil. occ., R. front. | Yes | Yes | No |
O’Connor et al. (39) | Encephalitis | R. occ., par., front., MT, IT, AT | Yes | Yes | No |
Ogden (26) | CHI | Bil. occ. | Yes | Yes | No |
Trojano and Grossi (43) | CHI | Bil. occ., front, temp, MT, ∼IT | Yes | Yes | No |
Ratcliff and Newcombe (40) | Encephalitis or CVA | Bil. occ., par., MT, IT | Yes | Yes | ? |
Albert et al. (35) | CVA | Bil. occ. | Yes | No | Yes |
Gomori and Hawryluk (38) | Cyst | Bil. occ., IT | Yes | No | Yes |
Beyn and Knyazeva (36) | CVA | ? | Yes | ? | ? |
Shuttleworth et al. (41), case 2 | CHI | Bil. occ., MT | Yes | ? | ? |
Taylor and Warrington (42) | Atrophy | Bil. occ., ∼IT | Yes | ? | ? |
Wapner et al. (44) | CVA | L. occ., temp., MT | Yes | ? | ? |
The 11 cases listed met the three criteria for visual memory deficit. The five cases with RA > AA are listed first. CHI, closed-head injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; occ., occipital; par, parietal; front, frontal; temp, temporal; MT, possible medial temporal damage; IT, inferotemporal damage; AT, anterior temporal damage; RA > AA, is the retrograde amnesia reported as more severe than the anterograde amnesia; gradient, is there a temporal gradient; ?, case study provides no information; ∼, deficit is marginal or report is equivocal.