Table 2.

Cases of imagery loss that did not meet criteria of visual memory deficit but that had amnesia

Reference	Etiology	Damage	Copy	Recognize	Draw	RA > AA	Gradient
Boyle and Nielsen (49)	Neoplasm/surgery	R. occ., MT	No	No	No	No	Yes
Levine (51)	Neoplasm	R. occ., par., MT	No	No	No	Yes	?
Shuttleworth et al. (41)	CVA and CHI	Bil. occ. temp., MT, ∼IT	No	No	No	?	?
Arbuse (48)	Neoplasm	L. occ., par.	No	Yes	?	?	?
Grossi et al. (50)	CVA	L. occ., MT, ∼IT	Yes	Yes	No	?	Yes
Hunkin et al. (27)	CHI	Bil. occ., IT	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No
Schnider et al. (32, 52)	CVA	L. occ., MT, IT	Yes	Yes	No	?	No

Three cases that would have met our criteria for visual memory deficit if they could have drawn a object that was present are listed first. CHI, closed-head injury; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; occ., occipital; par, parietal; temp, temporal; MT, possible medial temporal damage; IT, inferotemporal damage; copy, patient can copy drawings or draw from a model; draw, patient can draw an object from memory; RA > AA, is the retrograde amnesia reported as more severe than the anterograde amnesia, ?, case study provides no information; ∼, deficit is marginal or report is equivocal.