Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan 30;88(1):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.080

TABLE 2.

Number of fractures observed by skeletal site among 9258 Olmsted County, Minnesota, women following a hysterectomy in 1965-02 (cases) compared directly to 9258 age-matched community controls, with the count of each group affected (n) and the hazard ratio (HR) from a stratified hazards model. Follow-up of both members of a case-control pair was censored at the earliest follow-up date.a

Site Cases n Controls n HR (95% CI)
Skull/face 98 106 0.91 (0.69-1.21)
Hands/fingers 405 330 1.25 (1.08-1.45)
Distal forearm 350 327 1.09 (0.93-1.27)
Other arm 397 380 1.04 (0.90-1.20)
Clavicle/scapula/sternum 82 71 1.21 (0.88-1.67)
Ribs 253 225 1.11 (0.93-1.34)
Vertebrae 251 198 1.28 (1.06-1.55)
Pelvis 25 22 1.14 (0.64-2.02)
Proximal femur 192 198 1.00 (0.82-1.22)
Other leg 524 492 1.09 (0.96-1.24)
Feet/toes 588 467 1.32 (1.16-1.50)
Any site 2135 1879 1.21 (1.13-1.29)
a

Subjects were censored by death, emigration from the community or the occurrence of the indicated fracture.