Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan 30;88(1):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.080

TABLE 3.

Fracture risk following hysterectomy in 1965-2002 among 9258 Olmsted County, Minnesota, women compared to 9258 age-matched community controls, by indication for surgery.

Indication (n) Any fracture HR (95% CI)a Osteoporotic fracture HR (95% CI)a
Cancer of reproductive tract (949) 1.21 (0.97-1.51) 1.03 (0.74-1.44)
Debulking of urinary or GI cancer (126) 1.82 (1.01-3.29) 2.00 (0.86-4.67)
Pre-cancerous conditions (2173) 1.10 (0.96-1.26) 0.97 (0.77-1.21)
Uterine leiomyomata (2607) 1.12 (0.98-1.27) 0.99 (0.81-1.22)
Endometriosis (705) 1.46 (1.11-1.92) 1.38 (0.81-2.33)
Uterine/vaginal prolapse (1139) 1.28 (1.07-1.54) 1.33 (1.01-1.74)
Menstrual disorders (1117) 1.50 (1.21-1.87) 1.23 (0.79-1.92)
Menopausal disorders (79) 0.93 (0.44-1.98) 0.57 (0.17-1.95)
Inflammatory diseases of pelvis (270) 1.18 (0.79-1.77) 1.44 (0.76-2.72)
Other indications (93) 1.29 (0.48-3.45) 1.50 (0.25-8.98)
a

Hazard ratio from a stratified hazards model.