Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan 30;88(1):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.080

TABLE 4.

Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios (HR)a for the development of any new fracture among 9258 Olmsted County, Minnesota, women following a hysterectomy in 1965-02.

Risk factorb Univariate HR (95% CI) Multivariate HR (95% CI)
Age at surgery (per 10-year increase) 1.32 (1.28-1.36) 1.30 (1.26-1.34)
Calendar year (per 10-year increase) 1.16 (1.11-1.21) 1.14 (1.09-1.19)
Uterine prolapse indication (yes versus no) 1.25 (1.13-1.39) 1.16 (1.04-1.29)
Pelvic floor repair (yes vs no) 1.13 (1.05-1.22) -
a

Proportional hazards models where the event is a fracture and the dependent variable survival time (days) free of fracture.

b

Only risk factors that were significant in the univariate and/or multivariate analyses are included in the table.