Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007 Apr 15;18(7):1217–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.03.033

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparison of the internal energy deposition from electron capture by Mg(H2O)n2+, n = 4 – 6, 32, with adiabatic ionization energies of Mg(H2O)n+ from BLYP (□) and MP2 (◊) calculations from [69] as a function of cluster size. The average energy deposition (Eavg; ▲), as well as the range of energies from the maximum observed (EMO) to the maximum possible (EUL), are indicated. For Mg(H2O)42+, no upper limit (EUL) is indicated because MgOH+ is formed. (see text).