Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2004 Apr;51(4):761–767. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20037

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

Comparison of the same 40 Np image (a) raw, and with (b) view-sharing, (c) RECT95% filter, (d) LL80% filter, and (e) LL95% filter. Two signal intensity profiles (labeled I and II), as shown in image a, were obtained crossing the endocardial border, and are plotted in f and g, respectively. The images and profiles demonstrate temporal blur of the endocardial wall, which varies with the temporal filtering applied. They show that rFOV imaging with a low-latency filter provides reduced temporal blur compared toview-sharing, but has slightly increased temporal blur compared to the RECT95% filter. The error bars on the signal intensity profiles are equal in magnitude to the noise measured in the images, and demonstrate that the differences between profiles are due to the temporal filtering applied, and not to image noise.