Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan 18;25(7):1105–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.12.003

Table 2.

Mean concentration and interexamination coefficients of variation of lipid measurements obtained at 3.0T and 1.5T.

3.0T 1.5T P-value


Measured Lipid Ratio Concentration * CV Concentration * CV
Soleus a
 IMCL 830.3 ± 92.1 12.0 675.3 ± 91.1 9.6 0.50
 EMCL 983.2 ± 156.7 11.6 992.3 ± 158.2 6.1 0.06

Tibialis anterior b
 IMCL 139.5 ± 15.8 26.4 131.3 ± 12.8 20.3 0.02
 EMCL 180.6 ± 27.0 21.5 188.4 ± 39.5 22.6 0.49
*

, Data are mean lipid ratio concentrations, in institutional units, ± standard errors of the mean. Concentrations are averages across

1

H MR spectroscopic data from both visits.

Comparison between mean CVs at 3.0T and 1.5T using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test.

a

, 9 subjects, 18 spectra.

b

, 15 subjects, 30 spectra.

CV, mean interexamination coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) in percent.

IMCL, intramyocellular lipid methylene protons (1.3 ppm) and EMCL, extramyocellular lipid methylene protons (1.5 ppm), both scaled to unsuppressed water peak (3.0 ppm).