Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2007 May 4;28(24):3537–3548. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.026

Table 2.

EC attachment efficiency, doubling time, and confluent density comparisons between CRRETAWAC FSP and RGD FSP. The value of each parameter from peptide FSP is normalized by the FN value from the same experiment ± normalized standard deviation. RGD FSP data is from Larsen et al. [5].

Attachment
Efficiency
Doubling
Time
Confluent
Density
CRRETAWAC FSP : FN 1.4 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2 1.1 ± 0.1
RGD FSP : FN 0.8 ± 0.3 0.5 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.7